Loading...
Uploaded by LetsRunFaster on Mar 11, 2008
Steve Scott holds on strong to win in a 3:32.73.http://www.runnervision.com
Sports
Standard YouTube License
Yes I agree - Scott was a fine miler and if it were not for the British trio he would have been the best in the world over those years.
LPCLASSICAL 7 months ago
@LPCLASSICAL Scott ran 3/10ths of a second off coes wr for the mile and has run sub-4 more times than anyone in the world. That's called talent!
koishooter 7 months ago
STATISTICS CALCULATION - from
BR-0 com/olympics htm
tietajajoshua 2 years ago
The years that Coe and Ovett were absent through injury/illness 82/83 - Scott benefitted.
LPCLASSICAL 2 years ago
Load more suggestions
Yes I agree - Scott was a fine miler and if it were not for the British trio he would have been the best in the world over those years.
LPCLASSICAL 7 months ago
@LPCLASSICAL Scott ran 3/10ths of a second off coes wr for the mile and has run sub-4 more times than anyone in the world. That's called talent!
koishooter 7 months ago
STATISTICS CALCULATION - from
BR-0 com/olympics htm
tietajajoshua 2 years ago
The years that Coe and Ovett were absent through injury/illness 82/83 - Scott benefitted.
LPCLASSICAL 2 years ago