Paul of Tarsus and Stoicism
Loading...
Loading...
1,494
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 4:28Re: Exposing Paul of Tarsus part 1.by Glorthac674 views
- 7:55Stoicism: The Original Self Help? With Jules Ev...by standstrongtv289 views
- 1:30The REAL TRUTH about SAINT PAULby dallasjewishboy21,651 views
- 7:35History of Stoicism Documentaryby tidzski23,228 views
- 2:37Stoicism Philosophy - Zeno's 11 Pointsby TheAustralianPhoenix8,947 views
- 9:05Documentary : Paul of Tarsus - Paul Hijacked J...by minooo447,397 views
- 5:17Exposing Paul of Tarsus part 1.by moh775,398 views
- 3:44St. Paul of Tarsusby tristanforsyth4,334 views
- 4:04Stoicism, quotations from Aurelius, Epictetus, ...by tanit13,357 views
- 2:16Number of the Beasts; 666=Trinityby santosan92,305 views
- 2:01Saint Paul of Tarsusby catholicnewsagency32,250 views
- 7:39Sombrous - Stoicismby c486i762 views
- 0:56The life of Paul of Tarsus on the big screenby romereports6,600 views
- 9:19The Philosophy and Ethics of Epictetusby wmiller248,729 views
- 4:25The Stoicsby efekeremm411 views
- 9:16Neo-Stoicism in the Modern Worldby Professoranton5,663 views
- 3:59Stoicism by Eric Louxby ultimateninjaguydan633 views
- 9:54The Virtual University: Marcus Aurelius Part 1by CavemanIEWC49,375 views
- 5:49Paul of Tarsusby OlDoc78270 views
- 1:09Creative Quotations from Marcus Aurelius for Ap...by CreativeQuotations8,325 views
scribd (dot) com / nb812
DreamsofMajesty 1 year ago
I must say that the link between Paul and Stoicism is extremely thin. Although he probably was influenced by his contemporary thought, when it comes to more important details like epistemology classical Stoics (as apposed to modern stoics) tend to be much more materialistic than most Christians.
snofthndr 1 year ago
The textual style of 2 Peter is very different than that of 1 Peter, which makes me wonder about its authenticity, particularly because without it, the Pauline epistles would not be canonical. This question is absolutely fundamental to the nature of Christianity.
I recognise that Jesus saw the Gentiles as relevant. That much is in the Gospels. I also think Paul was necessary to the spread of Christianity.
nineteenthly 3 years ago
(1) Paul and his writings are legitimate, even Peter says so in 2 Peter 3:16. (2) Jesus founded Christianity by being the Christ. (3) He sent Peter to the Gentiles to spread the Gospel and gave the Great Commission to evangelize the world. Paul and Jesus did not have two different religions. Jesus grafted in the Gentiles and made Jew and Gentile one.
tube99xx 3 years ago
Paul is the founder of Christianity, not Jesus. Without him, it would have been a Jewish sect. Concerning Stoicism, Paul has a clear eschatology based on a linear view of time and a personal God, both concepts foreign to the spirit of Stoicism. Even so, Stoicism was an important influence on Christianity. Paul is also too passionate to be a true Stoic.
nineteenthly 3 years ago