Black Holes Plasma Cosmology Electric Universe Astronomy

Are Black Holes science fact or science fiction? We take a critical look from a plasma perspective. Mathematical abstraction now dominates the astronomical scene, but has this lead us astray. Black Holes, Event Horizons, math, plasma cosmology, electric universe, dark matter, dark energy.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Black
• Holes
• Electric
• Universe
• Event
• Horizons
• Astronomy

[PlanetOfTheMonkeys]

I love how this video starts with the statement that black holes are nothing more than scientific theory, then goes to present a topic that is not even a scientific theory, has no peer reviewed articles in the scientific community, and no evidence to support it.

The rebuttal to this will inevitably be based upon a massive conspiracy in the scientific community that demands evidence, peer review of everything, all things that get in the way of Plasma Heads making baseless claims they're right.

[soupdragon42]

@PlanetOfTheMonkeys Plasma Cosmology grows strong on a diet of supportive evidence, whereas gravitiational cosmology poisons itself on an increasing array of exotic hypotheticals.

[soupdragon42]

@big1buddy The LHC does not work, and wll not work, so worry not about it destroying the earth. And therein lies a clue. Gravitational theory is dead. The Higgs-Boson is a figment of the imagination. Oh, and GPS works just fine without the myth of time dilation.

[soupdragon42]

@goldencowboy748 Mathematics has become a language in it's own right, but there are disputes over some basic principles. Furthermore, math should be the slave of science, not the master. Scientific theories should be based on observations, not what the we think we should see based on mathematical speculations.

[ZajoSTi]

Never mind. Anyway, you shoud visit holoscience com and thunderbolts info to find further information about plasma cosmology. Have fun ;)

[ZajoSTi]

Wtf second part of my comment is blocked. Does youtube have some restricted combination of words? Now this made me crazy.

[ZajoSTi]

I am not their side. I always just try to side with the truth. They just seem to be far closer to it. So ok, you've heard about it, that's good. Because you should know that Princeton has a doctorate graduate program in Plasma physics within department of astrophysical sciences. If something is not common knowledge it doesn't mean it's freezed. There is really vast info abou it, evidences and proofs comes on and on. You just have to look for it, because they don't tell it in TV news. Why? Becau

[soupdragon42]

@PlanetOfTheMonkeys There are a huge number. The Plasma Universe is supported by the IEEE, the largest professional body. Also, see plasmauniverse(dot)com for a list of peer reviewed papers. Your claims grow increasingly bizarre.

[PlanetOfTheMonkeys]

@ZajoSTi If Plasma Cosmology is growing, why are there no papers on the topic since 2004?

Why is all work in the field, all quotes mined, etc... from the 1990's?

And of course, given that the few predictions Plasma Cosmology made have been discredited due to actual discovered evidence, I am at a loss as to why you say it grows stronger when all I find shows it is a dead theory?

If you can point to a peer reviewed paper on the topic done after 2004, I would appreciate it.

Thanks!

[PlanetOfTheMonkeys]

@rellikzephyr You are right on the money. Sadly, Plasma Cosmology not only has no evidence to support it's claims, it does not make many predictions that can be tested. Calling it a scientific theory is a stretch.

Top it off with actually evidence discovered in the past decade that totally contradicts the few predictions Plasma Cosmology made leaves this "theory" for the history books, not science.

But people cling to it because it's "fringe" and they think that is cool.

Cheers

[PlanetOfTheMonkeys]

@soupdragon42 Point to SOMETHING that has been published in the field since 2004 then. Your claim it is a growing field. There is zero evidence that supports your claim.

FACT is, it is dead except for the few who are willing to disregard real evidence in favor of what they just wish were the case. (aka NOT scientists)

But don't just take this as a "you say/I say" scenario. Just show a peer reviewed paper on the topic in the past 5 years. Otherwise you sound like a creationist.

[ZajoSTi]

Plasma cosmology grows stronger because it's lacking the delusional mathematicians. It is very simple why clasic model is getting less popular. With all the unknown magic particles and energies, their statements that they are really there but we have no proof nor have seen them is getting really suspicious. They imagine something, add it into equations and if the result is good, it simply exist no matter no one haven't seen it

[soupdragon42]

@PlanetOfTheMonkeys "Plasma Cosmology is dead". This has to be the most bizarre comment I have ever heard. Go back to sleep.