In this speech on March 23, 1983, President Reagan laid out his vision for the Strategic Defense Initiative. To learn more about missile defense, check out the 33 Minutes documentary from The Heritage Foundation: http://www.33-minutes.com/33-minutes
SDI was a massive waste of money. Even if we were to use modern computers which vastly outpace the ones made in the 80's, they would not be capable of accurately targeting nuclear missiles, and could easily be distracted by launching several decoy projectiles.
Are you people nuts? SDI has not worked nor will it ever work. You're so ignorant it's scary. SDI was a massive policy failure that was not even scientifically possible.
I remember the left wingnut media mocked him big time for his vision, yet with each year... we continue to make this type of defense system better and better.
Okay, so what Reagan is saying, is, that we could reduce nuclear arms, only if it were possible sometime in the future, but not at any time in the foreseen immediate future. Nuclear weapons is our power and to continue to build upon them for our security and power. Then one day maybe? when we've overpowered other nuclear countries we could maybe disarm and only then. So what Obama is doing is the opposite of what Reagan is talking about because we have enemies right now nuclear to destroy us.
SDI was a massive waste of money. Even if we were to use modern computers which vastly outpace the ones made in the 80's, they would not be capable of accurately targeting nuclear missiles, and could easily be distracted by launching several decoy projectiles.
Derekrife1 1 week ago
@johnskudris Luddite
riethc 7 months ago
Are you people nuts? SDI has not worked nor will it ever work. You're so ignorant it's scary. SDI was a massive policy failure that was not even scientifically possible.
johnskudris 1 year ago
I remember the left wingnut media mocked him big time for his vision, yet with each year... we continue to make this type of defense system better and better.
He was truly ahead of his time.
joshpnw 1 year ago
Okay, so what Reagan is saying, is, that we could reduce nuclear arms, only if it were possible sometime in the future, but not at any time in the foreseen immediate future. Nuclear weapons is our power and to continue to build upon them for our security and power. Then one day maybe? when we've overpowered other nuclear countries we could maybe disarm and only then. So what Obama is doing is the opposite of what Reagan is talking about because we have enemies right now nuclear to destroy us.
cumtied 1 year ago
@Slyrr7 Pffft, hell no...Obama's got no balls on national security and foreign diplomacy.
It's a lot worse nowadays that we are aware of nukes being held by terrorist states.
Agent1W 1 year ago
Does this sound like what Obama is doing?
Slyrr7 1 year ago