9/11: So Much Debris Hit WTC7 from twin tower, BLOCKED Building 7, says ABC News on 9/11

In this ABC News interview, on 9/11 (end of clip), Jerry Hauer of NYC's Office of Eemrgency Management describes how THERE IS SO MUCH DEBRIS IN FRONT FROM WTC 7, THAT PEOPLE CANNOT EVEN GET IN TO THE BUILDING AT WTC7. And he says the building is structurally unsafe.

Debris that fell from 110 stories up -- from over 1000 feet -- from the WTC twin towers severely damaged WTC 7. The debris BLOCKED access into Building 7.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11

[Emsworker68]

The title of your video says: So much debris hit WTC 7. But no where in your video do you show this damage to WTC 7. Your title also says the debris was blocking WTC 7. But blocking a building is very different from hiting a building and doing structural damage.

[JonathonMoseley]

@Emsworker68  Yeah, actually it does show the debris hitting the WTC. Watch the video again

[BatmansArse]

Rubbish!

[dreamdiction]

@JonathonMoseley Building 7 sustained only minor damages, see photos below.

.wtc7.net/damageclaims.html

[Gonga2121]

@Mikester1200 What i believe is that someone besides the "cave mans" are involved in this attacks. This is why that many anwsers are still waiting to be replyed, i mean if they have nothing to hide they can anwser it right?

[Mikester1200]

@Gonga2121 One of your major theory's in the 911 conspiracy is the media was in on it so why would they show him saying that if it was to mean demolition?

[Gonga2121]

@19d4life Grow up! Do u really belive he meant to "pull" the firefighters??? He said "we decided to pull it" Do you believe "it" is referring to the firefighters??? Stop being ridiculous... i'm done with this!

[Gonga2121]

@19d4life Im wrong? i proved i'm right. Instead of insulting try to come up with proof! How can you americans be so blind...

[Gonga2121]

@19d4life "The term "pull it" means pull it over. The term isn't used much today, because of the modern equipment used by demolition contractors. Fifty years ago wrecking contractors were less affluent, they depended more on ingenuity in the work place than on equipment. This was especially true when large buildings were taken down with hand labor. In those situations most interior and exterior walls had to be cabled and "pulled" in onto floors. "

[Gonga2121]

The owner of the World Trade Centers (the three that collapsed) said in an interview that he and the FDNY decided to PULL the building.

God even the owner admits that the demo. was planned....

[mrjazz747]

Funny how there was another building directly across the towers that was heavily damaged, and a lot smaller than building 7 and it didn't fall down. Very, very fishy!

[JonathonMoseley]

@cancanbiker No, John O'Neil was not head of security of the World Trade Center. He was hired by ONE PARTICULAR COMPANY that rented space inside the World Trade Center to provide security.

Security for the WTC was and is run by the NYC Police Department, NY Port Authority division. The owner of the WTC is the NY Port Authority.

Kroll Associates had NO significant role in the operational security at WTC -- only providing consulting advice = studies, white papers, written reports

[Emsworker68]

@JonathonMoseley I know, I have seen other videos in the last two months that show some debris strike. Still, the fires were isolated and should not have lead to a uniform collapse that we saw that day.

[cancanbiker]

@Jonathon

John O 'Neil didn't start his job until shortly before 9 11and he was head of security. Given Hauer's connection to OEM and Giuliani and the fact O'Neil was head of security and the fact they do building security globally I believe their apparatus consisted of more than merely giving advice about car bombings. Jerry Hauer was OEM director and was a critical figure in getting the OEM in WTC 7. I agree the PA was in large responsible for security but wouldn't loose sight of Kroll

[JonathonMoseley]

@cancanbiker "leads" and "money trail" are complete crap. That is the crazy talk of conspiracy nuts.

Security of the WTC was run by the NY City Police, Port Authority Division. The owner of the WTC was and is the NY Port Authority. It was leased by Silverstein Properties.

John O'Neill and Kroll merely provided ADVICE to the NY Port Authority on how to improve security after 1993.

John O'Neill was an anti-terrorist leader in the FBI

[cancanbiker]

@JonathonMoseley

Exactly. He was hired by Hauer @ Kroll. Kroll leads to AIG and the money trail goes from there. Kroll is like a private cia.... My point was Hauer has his fingerprints all over 9 11and its strange the managing director of the company doing security for the WTC is on TV on 9 11 to give the official story. Don't be fooled as he describes how the debris from the collapse weakened WTC7 because he knew they were coming down.

[JonathonMoseley]

@cancanbiker Why do you -- like most people -- ask questions you can easily look up for yourself? In the few seconds it took to post the question, you could have found the answer. John P. O'Neill, anti-terrorism expert at the FBI and expert on Al Qaeda, was hired by Kroll Associates. Kroll Associates was hired to improve security at the World Trade Center as a result of the 1993 bombing of the Wolrd Trade Center

[cancanbiker]

Tell us who hired John O'Neil?

[Seller3D]

this 9/11 is a planed thing not no dam accident . this is all planed out years before it happened. and happened on purpose .

[monkinator66]

keep it for what? have you lost sight of your own argument, you soft bastard?

[JonathonMoseley]

The 9/11 Commission was not INTENDED to answer the types of questions you have.

The Commission was convened to investigate why the US government failed to detect and prevent the 9/11 attacks, and how well the govt responded.

The questions you have are completely outside the scope of the 9/11 Commmission.

There were dozens of OTHER investigations that dealt with your questions.

Private engineers and building experts were on site within HOURS, and have reported extensively.

[jtrish23]

the 9/11 comission,the NIST reports are not telling the truth!!!!! in fact they can't even answer some of the most simple questions and flat out refuse to answer them!!!!! so keep going by those reports and be happy with those lies but we all know the truth!!! and it's not coming from your wack put together videos!!!!

[Skeptic121]

Well, guess what Jonathon: not everyone who disagrees with you knows he is wrong. I don't suppose YOU think you are wrong so stop putting words in my mouth?

I don't go to your work and knock the dick out of your mouth..so don't put words in mine.

[JonathonMoseley]

I understand that you KNOW you are wrong but refuse to admit it.

The heart of the 9/11 Falsers arguments starts with the idea that unless THEY PERSONALLY are convinced, then the public explanation of 9/11 cannot be true.

This is an impossible std, b/c they refuse to listen to the truth.

If you are honestly seeking understanding, that's great.

But you're not, and we all know it.

You WANT the result to be a certain result, regardless of the evidence.

You have to start right

[Skeptic121]

"Land in NYC is not free? Well, have you been by Fresh Kills recently? Notice any construction there? I didn't think so! As for shipping it to Asia for recycling, why not sell it to the highest American bidder? I would have bought a few pieces for more than the recyclers paid...and I would have come and gotten it!