Fruechte Gravity Theory Lecture (part 1 of 2)

(for Part 2 go to): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce1JqoCjjZE

Kevin Fruechte's 2-part lecture on his gravity theory. For more information go to:

http://www.FruechteTheory.com

On Fruechte's website you will find his short paper and abstract, his full paper, a calculated value of G, and his blog.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Gravity
• physics
• string
• theory
• electromagnetism
• gamma
• rays
• relativity
• particle
• fruechte

[Jammieg001]

And also would I be correct in assuming that the graviton is a particle name given to represent an oscillating + to - waveform of gravitational information sent from one bit of matter to another, at some incredibly small frequencies.

[kfruechte]

The graviton is of short wavelength and very high frequency. Your interpretation of the waveform is an interesting way of looking at it.

[Jammieg001]

One other thing, there are tiny incremental distance/time and force/mass and inverse/square changes going on in this "fulltick" rather than standard/limited particle absorption/emission model, the mass doesn't increase instantly, it takes 1 step up in mass and things must change however minutely, changing the next step up and so on until the full cycle is complete. Plz don't think I'm trying to hijack your theory, if you find a resolution, you'll have done what I've/manyafew have been unable.

[kfruechte]

I tend to see things in simpler terms, and look forward to the things others will do to advance gamma ray technology beyond our present knowledge. With high profile engineering projects at work, and helping teens with math and science homework in the evenings, not much else is fitting into my schedule right now.

[COROVICD]

please correct me if I am wrong in understanding this theory, but according to it, gravity is produced by gamma rays produced by electrons. Does that mean that any strong currents will produce lots of gamma rays and thus changes in gravity?

[physiker111]

Wow.. this is ridiculous. No offense, but this is just pure nonsense. If it were in any way true or made any sense, it'd be in a published paper and not a youtube video. You probably know that though.

[rysw19]

and wait.... the atom is held together by gravity? don't believe a word of this arrogant bs.

[rysw19]

he seems to be under the impression that gravity only acts on atoms and molecules..... what?

[rysw19]

@anticlimax18 don't be ridiculous. how many peer-reviewed papers have you published? i bet they'd tear you to shreds. if you'd like to send it to me via email, i bet i could too.

[anticlimax18]

Good kFruechte I hope US defence be able to create a UFO Tech Anti-Gravitation Ship.

But does it comes Close to UNIFICATION ... the greatest Quest of Elbert Einstein?

Mine Does ... supports Gravity, Magnetic forces, Electro Magnetic forces, Multi-dimensions, Etc. Big List... but i m close to UNIFICATION.

[ScottishProfessor]

Gravity is a condition of universal vacuum (see my vid on Gravity; just fundamental concepts). Energy functions within the framework of universal gravity, but energy does not act to directly produce gravity. We can use energy to circumvent and manipulate gravitation, but this (energy) should not be interpreted as gravity's source. Einstein erred in holding stubbornly to the field theory in order to exactly define gravity. Good video nevertheless.

[Jammieg001]

I understand