Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Evolution Theory, Creation - Answered Questions. Science and Logic vs. Evolution and Creation 2 / 6

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,576
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (171)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @gregrutz if evolutin is true why dont organisms live forever? why didn't evolution make them that way?

  • @gregrutz the archaeopteryx is a bird, we have 6 species today that have claws on their wings and teeth much like it

    I dont really believe in evolution just because it doesn't make sense logically; Bombardier beetles mix two different chemicals together causing a chemical reaction which shoots out their butt and can kill predators. How would the evolution work? The first time the chemicals evolved they would mix and explode killing the beetle...

  • @gregrutz thats what most people dont understand, they see changes to dogs and finches and they conclude that the changes can keep going. Genetically it doesn't work that way. Micro evolution is just changes (scrambling of DNA). Mutations, macroevolution, is the theory that organisms can INCREASE their gene pool, this we havent seen. Scientists have done thousands of experiments of all types trying to find this "creation" but so far they havent found it.

  • @seeheers Macro evolution does not make ''totally new'' just small changes you call micro evolution. Dogs always make dogs. Dogs and cats have a common ancestor, there is nothing 'totally new'' They both have two eyes, nose, same # teeth, four legs etc. They are not that different but can't interbreed, they are different species.

    Every fossils is of a complete species, just like today. There are many transitional fossils, like dinosaurs with feathers.

  • @seeheers Please tell me how the evolution of the basic Phyla 530 million years ago and the fact that all life back then was small marine creatures supports your religion creation story?

  • @gregrutz the only really alternative is creation, there aren't any other 'theories' that can explain this sudden explosion of species during the Cambrian period. They had to be created there isn't any other explanation.

  • @gregrutz no, there is a very large line between mIcro and mAcro evolution macro evolution says that the genome pool can be expanded micro just says that genes can be mixed up... nothing totally new.

    The fossil record shows no intermediate's. We dig up dinosaurs all the time, yet most of the fossils we find fit into a species... if evolution (slow gradual change) were true it should be impossible to find two species of dinosaurs exactly the same.

  • @seeheers If the change was too big you would say there was a Gap. If the change is too small then you call it Micro evolution. Fucking Creatards.

  • @gregrutz If you really examine evolution you will find that all the evolution that supposedly has been "proven" is really just MICRO-evolution, changes within existing genomes, not MACRO-evolution, a change in the gene pool.

  • @gregrutz No not at all, new changes in DNA has never been seen. it is impossible for a organism to create new DNA sequences, therefore making evolution an impossible joke. Even mutations only change existing genes, never making completely new ones.

    w09.biomedcentral(dot)com/1471­-2164/7/239

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more