Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Chickenasaurus attacks! This is Genesis Week with Ian Juby (Wazooloo), Season 1, Episode 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,740
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jan 5, 2012

http://wazooloo.com
In this episode, Dr. Jack Horner attempts to de-evolve a chickenasaurus, creation being put into the public schools, and we dive into the hate mail.

This is Episode 2 of season 1 of Genesis Week, with a new episode out every Thursday.

http://ianjuby.org
http://genesisweek.com

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (327)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BenWalburn

    Then why doesn't science tell your story Ben?

  • @BenWalburn

    Nothing BUT religious opinions on your side, Ben.

    Its called Biology Ben.

    Its not an opinion.

    Its science.

  • @odinata No religious opinion on my side whatsoever. On your side though, it's all you've got. Creation deals with what we know, evolution deals with what we don't. Crazy, huh? Of course you will disagree with me, nobody likes their religion insulted

  • @BenWalburn

    He isn't correct.

    Your religious opinion can't replace science.

    

  • @odinata once again, you are incorrect. If it were religious opinion, we would not be having this conversation. I would be here just as you are, an atheist.

    There is no appeal to genius. Nobody EVER said his intelligence made him correct.

  • @BenWalburn

    "nor the appeal to authority are valid either."

    Then why do you think that the Hamburglar's IQ is relevant?

    Why the appeal to his "genius"?

  • @BenWalburn

    Why do you feel your religious opinion is more valid than the science done by trained professionals?

  • @IoEstasCedonta My point is that they can only go by appearance. Sure, they can break it down to each part of the feather/scale but still, they are going by appearance. I didn't just take a quick look and say they look like chicken feathers, I examined them. But I might be wrong. How do the "experts" differentiate?

  • @BenWalburn No, they aren't. And if you were saying "here are the markers biologists claim differentiate them, and here's why they don't," your lack of credentials or broad support would be irrelevant. But all you have is "they look the same to me." And that's ignoring two of the three, and others I haven't listed, that couldn't possibly be mistaken for a chicken feather.

  • @IoEstasCedonta Neither the bandwagon appeal nor the appeal to authority are valid either.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more