William Lane Craig on the Michael Coren Show (Does God Exist?)

http://reasonablefaith.org - (Canada 2009) William Lane Craig on the Michael Coren Show. Craig, show host Coren and atheist Michael Payton debate and discuss the topic: "Does God Exist?"

I made some popular clips from this interview:

Christianity and the Age of the World:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IQoLg7w-_4

Why would God allow Evil and Suffering?:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwo4Zq-CyFs

The New Atheists are Not Intellectually "Bright":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14YM7MP6HzY

Can atheists give an argument against God?:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYC1jJVkgZg

Links to more videos on William Lane Craig:

http://drcraigvideos.blogspot.com

New Atheist Arguments Against God's Existence Refuted:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E104D9B7DFE9B7F6

Richard Dawkins made the worst argument in the history of Western thought:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9PjHVd_awo

William Lane Craig and his arguments and evidence for God:

Contingency Argument for God (the Leibnizian Argument):

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A7CE655E55212940

Kalam Cosmological Argument for God:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=54765A57944CEDDB

Teleological Argument for God:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=9A91B68D2FB071C1

Ontological Argument for God:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=48F0C019551ADD08

Moral Argument for God:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=EB04E423535F5D7C

Belief in God as Properly Basic:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PLEDED3EA10698ACE2

Category:

Education

Tags:

• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Interview
• Michael
• Coren
• Apologetics
• Cosmological
• Teleological
• Cause
• Design
• Evil
• Morality
• Evidence
• Good
• Suffering
• Atheist
• Atheism
• New
• Atheists
• Richard
• Dawkins
• Christopher
• Hitchens
• Daniel
• Dennett
• Sam
• Harris
• Brights
• Evolution
• Creationism
• Religion
• Philosophy
• Science
• Christianity
• Biola
• Talbot
• Jesus
• Resurrection

[EisEisBaby]

drcraigvideos =douchebag

[drcraigvideos]

@EisEisBaby *ROLLSEYES* Oh, stop it. You're hurting my feelings.

[mbelma6329]

WLC is too smart to talk to 95% of the people he encounters

[drcraigvideos]

@SaltonSeaMovie Uhm, yeah, genius, atheism isn't a negative claim and all it says is that it's re-defined as a NON-belief in God. No negative claim there! No, siree! I mean forget the fact that "non-belief" is negative but you know better, right? Next time, don't skip my rebuttal. You haven't even touched on anything I said.

[anosh88]

@mjfraser04 Are you serious? A good public speaker and having a somewhat extensive vocabulary? That's ALL you can attribute to Dr William Lane Craig? In case you've forgotten, he has two doctorate degrees and authored several books. I think you just don't understand what he is saying or the arguments he is making. You think Dawkins or Harris are smart? You should hear the arguments they present in their debates and books.

[GodHasNOMother]

@TheOrthodoxSteven Why not let the Scriptures TELL us about the Nature of G-d? 1. He is HOLY. 2. He is JEALOUS. 3. He will REVENGE. 4. He will show MERCY when one repents. The problem is that Modern Christianity has pictured Him as a Big old Sky Daddy that has patience FOREVER. 5. He is LONG SUFFERING, but He WILL cut you loose at some point if you persist in your evil. 6. He is the author of the Law WHAT YOU SOW YOU SHALL REAP.

[Imperativism]

Actually, this definition is false. Atheism is a negative claim by definition, which means it's fallaciously defined from the git-go. Agnosticism is not atheism. Both are absences of a belief in God. However, because of this negative definition, it becomes fallaciously inextricable from agnosticism, which it clearly is not. This is a contradiction resulting from the definition called reductio ad absurdem, which means: the official definition, resulting in contradiction, must be logically false.

[drcraigvideos]

@mjfraser04 Just because you don't understand what he's saying doesn't make you smarter.

[mjfraser04]

@mbelma6329 being a good public speaker and having a somewhat extensive vocabulary...doesn't make you "smart".

[TheFaithfulApologist]

@irishbear76 Dr. Gerald Shroeder, Really has a great insight about Genesis and Science. But I think he has been one up'd so to say. By the Christian Astronomer Dr. Hugh Ross, He has a Model of the universe called the RTB Model in which is correlates, Genesis days with different times. Its really interesting.

[ooJUKEBOXHEROoo]

Michael Payton can't argue for atheism if his life depended on it.LOL

[irishbear76]

Born a skeptic, I was an agnostic until my mid-20's. I asked the Lord Jesus into my heart and began searching writings, books, ESPECIALLY the Bible. I ended up figuring out I was indoctrinated not to believe in God despite the inner truth . Jesus Christ over time revealed Himself to me because I asked Him to.. I read a good book called Genesis and the BIg Bang by a Jewish professor at MIT named Dr. Shroeder (that book with Dr. Craig's use of reason. No atheist could argue against them!)