@nameofthepen Some of the findings of this long-term experiment are:
- The Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 38 mm per year.
- The Moon probably has a liquid core of about 20% of the Moon's radius.
- The universal force of gravity is very stable. The experiments have put an upper limit on the change in Newton's gravitational constant G of less than 1 part in 1011 since 1969.
@krisdevalle How do you know there is a higher return? Just because they said so? So the monitor displays some numbers and that is proof than man actually walked on the Moon? I mean the ridiculousness of your argument makes me wonder if you are playing with a full deck.
@Aeronauticalexplorer Aim a laser at another part of the moon : exceedingly minimal laser return.
Aim a laser at the cornercube site: Higher return.
It's that simple. It couldn't be much simpler. The cornercubes return a higher, more accurate laser reflection - allowing observatories to measure the distance to the moon down to the cm.
You can disbelieve this as much as you like; but it's accepted fact, and so far has not been debunked.
@krisdevalle You mean if other observatories are using them. How do they know if they were hand placed there or if the information they are seeing on their computer monitors are generated from corner cubes? They are only told that but they don't really know. How can you not think of these things? Just playing dumb again?
Our legendary Apollo heroes are wire-@ssed frauds. C'est le bummer. ٩๏̯͡๏)۶
nameofthepen 1 hour ago
@nameofthepen Some of the findings of this long-term experiment are:
- The Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 38 mm per year.
- The Moon probably has a liquid core of about 20% of the Moon's radius.
- The universal force of gravity is very stable. The experiments have put an upper limit on the change in Newton's gravitational constant G of less than 1 part in 1011 since 1969.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer - How many times do "astronomers" have to measure the distance to the moon?
nameofthepen 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer What proof do you have that these experiments are faked?
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle How do you know there is a higher return? Just because they said so? So the monitor displays some numbers and that is proof than man actually walked on the Moon? I mean the ridiculousness of your argument makes me wonder if you are playing with a full deck.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Aim a laser at another part of the moon : exceedingly minimal laser return.
Aim a laser at the cornercube site: Higher return.
It's that simple. It couldn't be much simpler. The cornercubes return a higher, more accurate laser reflection - allowing observatories to measure the distance to the moon down to the cm.
You can disbelieve this as much as you like; but it's accepted fact, and so far has not been debunked.
krisdevalle 2 hours ago
Proof they are on wire supports @ 0:16. AstroNot falls at a slower rate than the sand. Basic Physics people. Wake up.
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle You mean if other observatories are using them. How do they know if they were hand placed there or if the information they are seeing on their computer monitors are generated from corner cubes? They are only told that but they don't really know. How can you not think of these things? Just playing dumb again?
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@krisdevalle I wouldn't say shit. You wouldn't live very long at your low level of intelligence in such a predicament..
Aeronauticalexplorer 2 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer But a number of observatories around the world perform ranging using them.
Are you claiming they are also lying, and do you have any proof of that?
krisdevalle 3 hours ago