Howard Bloom's Big Bang Cosmology Science from The God Problem - The Big Bagel

Big Bang Cosmology Science from Howard Bloom - The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates
http://www.amazon.com/The-God-Problem...
This book unveils the Big Bagel Theory, a new theory of the beginning, middle and end of the Universe. It incorporates the Big Bang science theory and expands to plot out the end of the Universe.

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012-ho...

Big Bagel Theory (the Bloom Toroidal Model of the Universe) answers two of the biggest questions in today's theoretical physics and cosmology science:

1) If matter and anti-matter are generated in equal amounts at the same time, why is there so much matter in this universe and so little anti-matter?
2) And why did the galaxies in this universe start accelerating away from each other 6 billion years after the big bang? Where does the energy to pick up the pace come from? In other words, what the heck is dark energy?

The strange tale behind Big Bagel Theory and Big Bang Cosmology Science is in The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, available now from Amazon.com:

http://www.amazon.com/The-God-Problem...

See more about Howard Bloom on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_B...

or visit his website:
http://www.howardbloom.net

Full transcript here:
http://bryanbrandenburg.net/howard-bl...
Visualization by Bryan Brandenburg
http://bryanbrandenburg.net

The God Problem on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/HowardBloomT...

• Category

  Science & Technology

[GodHandPresents]

Bryan/Howard, if every action has an equal and opposite reaction, is it safe to say there is a direct opposition to our bodies at this very moment made of dark matter?

[Bryan Brandenburg]

There is no need to distinguish your particular body in the collective mass in the Universe, but as a fractal element in that Universe that is a fractal element in the sea of Universes, yes. Is there a mirror of yourself in the dark matter antiuniverse? Not necessarily as the Universe and Antiuniverse is a dynamic volume of mass and energy. But is there a constant equal an opposite force of dark energy that is similar to the constant force of gravity that acts upon your organism? Yes.

[ciucinciu]

interesting video, but i thought cosmologist already measured the geometry of the universe, and it adds up that is flat. /watch?v=i4UpvpHNGpM Neil DeGrasse explains it well

[Bryan Brandenburg]

It is flat in a curved space.

[subaridji]

Very interesting, but how this relates to proved increasing universe expand speeds? According to authors theory, expansion speed should slow down.

[Bryan Brandenburg]

The universe reached minimum speed at 7.7 billion years and is now accelerating as the antiuniverse is attracting the universe.

[john delay]

Randy Powell and Marko Rodin are all over this.

[econogate]

The thing i also was wondering was why does it all big bang over and over, what maybe the point to create and then destroy everything? What maybe gained by this and why did it start?

[econogate]

I was thinking that that would make the republicans dark matter, the unseen force, maybe religious and the democrats the force of matter, materialist, the seen universe, and when they cooperate and come together they annihilate each other!

[Pernell Woodson]

Fascinating

[HeartResurrection]

The problem lies not with the Big Bang, but with many Cosmologists, who since the discovery of the microwave echo of the Big Bang, have wriggled to find a way to explain away a creation event sometimes with the most spurious and contradictory physics(i.e. scalar field arguments). There just is no valid reason why all reality MUST be subject to physical explanations. Cosmologists are not philosophers and are very presumptuous to assume an expertise in a field outside of their own.

[HeartResurrection]

Really, from a philosophical or metaphysical standpoint this is schoolboy stuff. As long as the universe has the dimension of time it must depend on a reality outside of time. Bertrand Russel's complaint of who created God is in this context a meaningless question as it assumes a Creator confined by his own creation of time.