WTC7 Window Shot - Slow Motion, Zoomed In, Colour Adjusted

Source: International Center for 9/11 Studies NIST FOIA, 911datasets.org release 14, file CBS-Net Dub5 14.avi

Building What? - Building 7.
Please stand with the 9/11 families in calling for a NEW building 7 investigation.
http://buildingwhat.org/

Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/
As of January 23, 2011 there are 1,420 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 11,108 other supporters have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation.

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of collapse

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction

3.Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional

7. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:

8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses

10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• WTC7
• Building
• Controlled
• Demolition
• ae911truth
• Steeper33

[tonythatjesusloves]

what can you say , the way the sides come in , the whole thing is so obvious ,its amazing , they must think were stupid

[cramtoro]

i mean, how can a building fall in its footprint without any preparation?? Of course this was an inside job and the charges were exploding in an order fashion. Isnt it clear???

[chisan918]

@tonythatjesusloves because most of us are

[MrEphesians511]

...and if you believe a FIRE brought that down, you need to be FIREd AT

[alecboi84]

@tonythatjesusloves they dont think they KNOW majority are saturated in entertainment,useless debates,ignorance...

[monzinator]

@MrGorillaApe

This school building was no steel structure construction, it was concrete module building and its partly collapsed.

[monzinator]

this demolition company does a great job = straigt down in his footprint, like Larry like it ___ "and we decide to pull'it" !!! :)

[morttodd]

so to clarify we have yet another a fine example ( we could use frinstance the mandarin oriental fire or the chines apartment block fire too)where a bldg was totally in flames and remained standing compared to a bldg where few sacttered small and isolated fires somehow led to a complete shattering & rapid total collapse. There are vids on this site where they show you how impossible it is even with legit controlled demos. You need simultaneous compromise every stuctural member to liquify a bldg

[morttodd]

@morttodd, ok, reemptively I'll clarify, by undamaged I mean structurally undamaged, essentially the bldg remained at its full height regardless of having burnt, look on the web and see for yourself that only a small part of the bldg was collapsed, and remember this was not built to american standards

[morttodd]

@MrGorillaApe

Sorry no, just a small part of it did on a corner, not the whole bldg, the rest of the bldg about 90% was just fine and undamaged.

Try again, & thanks for playing

[MrGorillaApe]

@morttodd

Sorry, this is just not true. For example, the University of Delft's school of architecture building collapsed after a fire.

[morttodd]

Flight 93 was intended to hit bldg7, the 3 rd tallest in the complex, to give plausable deniability to the op. No other bldgs other than wtc 1,2, and 7 have ever collapsed from fire in history of the world. Molted white hot thermite is seen pouring out in some views.

One cant heat molten metals hotter than the flames, only thermite can get that hot. A red-orange-yellow 800 to 2000 degree flame cannot make white hot 4000 degree molten metal pour out of a building. Incandesence cant be faked