Chomsky on Global Warming

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:s7-rL_DqQvgJ:www.greenpeace.org...

Category:

Pets & Animals

Tags:

• Noam Chomsky
• corporations
• global warming
• weightlifting
• talking
• exercise
• news
• interview
• talk
• speech

[syncro16se]

Chomsky needs to study the facts, and not just listen to "scientists" who have an agenda. IPCC corruption and screwing around with the data to make it look right.

IPCC reports try to state that 2500 scientists are behind the reports, -but fail to mention that they refuse to take names off the list who just don't agree with it.

And that most of the people stated as being scientists are not - but actually politicians and bureaucrats.

[aerobique]

@syncro16se

"Chomsky needs to study the facts.."

lol thats ridiculous

there is not a single respected scientific body on this planet that would disagree with him here.. or disagree with the truly alarming conclusions of climate science

...it´s just amazing how brainwashed the public (you in this case) is by people with really "an agenda" that is clearly not science but confusing the public.

begin with this report to understand what happens here:

w w w . bit . ly/cclDzH

[ExtremeBogom]

@syncro16se

Sure, not all scientists agree. After all, they said there would be a 2nd Ice age...

But did this do any harm? No. Maybe some initial anxiety.

The fact that a majority of scientists agree on climate change does hold weight. It can't be ignored, and it would be silly to play it down.

If it's assumed wrong, it could have far worse effects than the scientists being wrong.

Surely it's better to be safe than sorry?

Why dispute it? What's the gain, other than more money?

[aerobique]

@ExtremeBogom

Hi!

"..they said there would be a 2nd Ice age..."

There were some ~in the 70´s or so. But even then there were much more on the global warming side. Its -as always- the superficial media´s fault looking for HEADLINES...Media suffers from "attention deficit hyperactivity disorder" (ADHD) ...still people repeat the ice age story 40 years later...Also the most powerful industries disturbing climate facts since decades. :(

Greenmans view, always great: watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M

[aerobique]

@DarkwingScooter

"...There are well established standards for science and climatologists somehow feel that they can stand above them because they have a boogyman story to tell."

How weird and uninformed are you? Climatologists ARE scientists- with all that goes with it. Not to mention that there is -not one- credible/reliable scientific body on the planet that would (or even could) disagree with the (truly alarming!) consensus of climatology. Only on"fox news" and other corporate spinpumps.

[bubbah]

@syncro16se You know, I don't particularly like CHUMPsky. I think he's a moron most of the time.

But you simply can't deny the scientific facts that clearly show climate change caused by humans.

Your lies and misinformation about the IPCC doesn't help either. The fact is that no credible scientific institution questions the IPCC reports, because these reports accurately portray the scientific consensus.

[wda013]

(for my archives:)

(2:20) "..cost-benefit-analysis: Suppose the [GW-deniers] are correct, and you do something about it. Ok, you've spent some money doing things you should have done anyway, like more renewable energy and so on... Suppose, on the other hand, the consensus is right. If you don't do anything, the human species is probably down the drain."

methinks, you don't have to be a [rocket] scientist to understand this argument; most children would grasp it.

[wda013]

thanks for this valuable upload.

--

this was recorded (aired?) when? and where? taken from where?

please add to the description !

[ExtremeBogom]

@resteep

No worries dude. Happy new year! :D

[resteep]

@ExtremeBogom indeed. i should have read past the first line.

whoops!

[ExtremeBogom]

@resteep

No dude, I know evolution is a reality.

I think you took my post the wrong way. I was using that example to defend the young man's right to disagree with climate change. If people want to deny it, then fine that's up to them.

But hey, about them dinosaur bones. Any chance you could let me in on this secret stash? ;)

[resteep]

@ExtremeBogom To compare the relative small handful of scientists who were taking about a coming ice age in the 60's with literally tens of thousands of scientists world wide who agree that climate change is a serious problem highlights your own lack of common sense more than anything else.

Let me guess, you think evolution is a liberal plot and Obama hid them dinosaur bones to trick you!

[resteep]

@syncro16se What a PERFECT example of the science-less double-speak chomsky is referring to!

Thanks!

[xtrmsprts]

haha love it! I'm surprised such a silly question was even put to Chomsky. His time is so valuable ...even thinking children know global warming is a real threat. Only selfish money-minded crooks like palin, fox news, the corpus of the GOP can deny it.