Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

scientist death threats Climategate emails

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
987 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 10, 2009

He explains his emails and how it was a article by a sceptic that made him question one of his fellow scientists
in an email .
It turns out that the atrical by the sceptic SUPRISE SUPRISE was all bullshit.
Andrew Bolt the bullshit artist cops a bit of flak from this scientist for his one eyed point of view.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @truemonolith Oh yeah, that one day trial. uh huh.

  • @Leehofooks Just the closed minded response I expected.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Climate Crock Sacks Hack Attack - Part 2
see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrXstacey I didn't give you a "disingenuous" list. I gave you the results of a poll. You want disingenuous? Look at the lists of scientists who deny global warming.

  • @MrXstacey "Do you deny the medieval warm period?" No, jackass. Of course the earth has had warming and cooling periods before. But the so-called "medievel warm period" mostly took place in the North Atlantic and didn't effect the global temperature as much as warming is today, and the evidence for the current one points to an anthropogenic cause. Do you ever do any real research? "Did CO2 cause it, not a chance" becaaaause... you say so?

  • @MrXstacey The UN isnt involved with carbon credit schemes. Those are to be set up by countries. I dont think you actually know what's going on with regards to the climate, and what countries want to do about it at all do you?

  • @truemonolith ah, herein lies the rub. I am not qualified to argue the amounts of each atmospheric level, it's the UN that tells us we have to pay for CO2 emissions. Carbon trading will not do anything to divert the real issues it will just make bankers happier. There are so many more toxins emitted in our atmosphere that it's embarrassing that people don't get that it's pollution that is the problem and that carbon taxing is not the answer. it's not the scientists I mock so much as the UNFCCC.

  • @ash4432 I don't blame the scientists, if the cronies at the UN asked me to work for them at the CRU with the billions of dollars given to them by the taxpayers, I'd be inclined to prove any theory they wished me to prove. Problem is, the question was never really "what is causing global warming?" Even Roger Revelle the grandfather of global warming apologized that his research sent so many people in the wrong direction on global warming. Put an RPM meter on his grave, I bet he's spinning now.

  • @MrXstacey Yes i have read a large chunk of the emails. I found the chain from Tom Wrigley to Tenbereth quite amusing.

    I dont think you've read the emails though, because theres only 1 chain of emails that follows the c02 line (and that is tenberth bemoaning that there is more c02 in the troposphere than in the stratosphere).

  • I dismiss Fox news as much as I do CNN and MSNBC. I am neither democrat or republican. Obama, Maurice Strong, and Al Gore key are players in on Chicago Climate Exchange. Carbon taxing will kill the economy cuz the money will NOT go back to the people who paid it, it will go to globalists. Europe has played with this market and the results have been criminal /watch?v=oL-e33oaI94 I am not against climatologists, I'm "against paid" for climatologists. there is no real money in dissent.

  • @truemonolith seriously, did you take the time to read the emails? after 500 or so there is only one conclusion that they are not trying to argue what is causing global warming but trying to find ways to convince us that CO2 is the culprit. as Rex murphy said here in Canada on CBC "Read the emails! you'll never look at climate science the same way again"

  • @Leehofooks point taken, although when investigating a crime one does tend to look for motive. (on the JFK thing, I argue it was because he was about to sign executive order 11110, although I do find it ironic that as many times as they wanted to assassinate Castro, he was the one who got assassinated.)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more