John Gross denies existance of molten metal

John Gross, one of the lead engineers of the NIST report is quesitoned about the existance of molten steel at the WTC building, the collapse of Building 7, and also explains how the NIST report did not do any analysis concerning the physical collapse of all three buidlings. John Gross was asked to come speak at the University of Texas at Austin by the Phil. M. Ferguson fund.

• Category

  News & Politics

[Cohunnamatta]

And we are to believe an office fire can melt structural steel? NIST the (National Institute of Standards and Technology) did not follow the national standards. Did not test for exotic accelerants or explosives. No wonder they dint find any...........

[nwonomad]

godofbigots is a paranoid skitzaphrenic..He has no interest in science journals or peer reviewed scientific studies..He is an alien believing god denying 911 conspiracy nut who believes the illuminati reptilians are coming for him...Please america BAN BATH SALTS (i'm sure he was normal once before)

[nwonomad]

There's no circumstantial evidence idiot (it was destroyed) The evidence you are claiming as circumstantial is actually heresay (it's just not considered evidence by any court system in your country)..But Many religious people understand this better than you do. You keep thinking you can prove things like 911 or that god doesn't exist. You have faith in this theory about 911 (against the facts) but you mock people who have faith in god...I'll let you work out if it makes sense.

[nwonomad]

Why don't other countries help? Because you have attacked every single one of them..I also told you that north korea would threaten nuke attacks,but you said no my government said we are at a safe distance (*facepalm) So who's violent? AMERICANS

[nwonomad]

So you finally woke up did you? I told you your government was the WORST most EVIL in the world..And you chose them! Boston bombing was a SWEET SIGHT!!!

[EddieVedder13]

Isn't funny how people defending the government's official position on 9/11 sound just like and in many cases are the same people who argue against climate change. Both have ignored science for the convenience of ignorance.

[uru39]

I can't reply to this in 500 characters. I'll send you a message.

[GodofBigots]

You're trying to explain away speed and the uniformity of the collapse of #7, I will tell you flat out that the speed and uniformity proves 100% that it was brought down with controlled demolition. How do I know this? Well first of all I know it by viewing the handful of separate videos, and then having thousands of structural engineers and physical scientists back that up with data. You are an idiot to argue the how when it is obvious, Your playing a game here. youtube com / watch?v=f462ya0DC0g