Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Letsplaychess.com presents Adams vs Kasparov 2005 - Sicilian Defence Najdorf Variation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
23,534
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 12, 2007

Play FREE online chess at http://www.chessworld.net

Adams vs Kasparov 2005

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (kingscrusher)

  • Please like this video if you got something out of it, or even better add it to your favourites. Help crush the Trolls! You could also subscribe to this channel to get notified of any new videos - subscribing is free and easy.Cheers, K.

Top Comments

  • KASPAROV IS FEDOR!!!!

  • kasparov is the best

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • nice game

  • Kasparov was a beast

  • for me it's kasparov

  • I feel like Adams could have had something there. I just do not see it though. The funny thing is that all the moves seem straight-forward for a gm game.

  • @Josho4096 He is not normally so quiet. I think his analytical assistant was trying to sleep or something.

  • Kasparov is magic

  • excellent game but your comments made wanna fall asleep. Put more pep in your step. You gotta talk lively and make us wanna be involved instead of talking like a college early history teacher. Not teasing you but sincerely telling you how I felt. Hope you make it as constructive criticism.

  • the bishop is protecting b2 as well, so, it looks that the knight could stop the attack but actually he would just delay the mate after rook b2, knight takes, queen takes and it's mate!

  • After Qxc2, I think the idea is just Rfc8, Queen's only square is d2, black takes the knight on f4 w/ the queen and black's a pawn up and white has no compensation, with just about every piece ready to attack the king some more. I guess Adams just didn't want to test Kasparov's endgame abilities. It probably was a good idea. Any extra time he would have wasted playing out the loss he could spend in analysis in stead.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more