Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: Prove the non-existence of God?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
597 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 3, 2008

prove this!!!

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Scrapheap71)

  • Autism???LOL! Down Syndrome?????? LOL! 9/11????LOL! Crusades??? LOL! Circumcision...???LOL2x!!! Westborough baptist church???LOL!!! Middle East??? LOL!!! Slaughterhouses??? LOL!!!! Btw, that's such a christian thought knowingly eating (in excess) mistreated chickens, missfed cows, genetically engineered cows/chickens, thus supporting the fact that there is overpopulation on this planet and yet eating more and making more and more babies, destroying mother earth...LOL!

  • @OffspringFTW65 Asphinctersayswhat?

  • Provide physical evidence for the spiritual? As soon as our technology comes up with the tools to measure the spirit...no problem. :) Til then man must use his spirit to know the Spirit of God. :)

  • The problem with this is that using the "spirit" of man to know the "spirit" of god is unrepeatable and has no means of external verification. Thus we can't repeatably and reliably show god to exist.

  • Right. :)

    Not until we develop scientific tools to quantify spirit reliably. Not sure how long that will be tho. :)

  • You should pray to god to give us the technology to do so. I think he'll give it to you. After all, he's been so good with giving us technology up 'till now. ;-P

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @OffspringFTW65 HERP A DERP DERP

  • Of course, if he give it to me, you wouldn't need to use it. it would be proof. Ha! LOL So you should believe based on all the other technology He has already given. :)

  • Although I agree with your sentiments, yes, this is logically flawed. It's merely an argument against a omnibenevolent, kind, peacefull, fuzzy warm god. In theory, "god' could could be many things. You also argue against "god of the gaps" thinking, but the argument doesn't apply to a Deistic or Pantheistic god. It is an effective argument against all theistic gods, however.

  • although it's logically incorrect... Some proof for the non-existence of god!

    1: the predator/prey arms race

    2: lots of predatory animals like to play with their prey (cats, snakes)

    3: 200 years ago we didn't know what viruses were. 100 years ago we didn't understand atoms. 50 years ago we didn't know about some subatomic particles that we do now. 25 years ago, we had no clue why gravity was so much weaker then the other fundamental forces. Simply put: god lives in the margins of science.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more