YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Boeing 777 rejected take off (RTO)

avvideos avvideos·5 videos
91
457,007
Like     Dislike 30

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like avvideos's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike avvideos's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add avvideos's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Oct 26, 2007

For certification purposes, Boeing 777 made this test to show that it can stop safely at maximum thrust, by the end of the runway, taxi for 5 minutes (the time needed for the firetrucks to reach the plane) and not catch fire from the great heat produced from the disk brakes. Very educative, enjoy. http://aviation-videos.blogspot.com/

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Zelin Xu

    777 did way better than A340-600

    · 25

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zelin Xu's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zelin Xu's comment.
  • dmaddles

    boeing, doing it better since 1916

    · 10

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate dmaddles's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate dmaddles's comment.

Video Responses


All Comments (434)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • DEEREMEYER1

    Things that happened after a past reference still happened in the past and there is no need for a "future in the past" tense.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.
    in reply to Q Nozomi (Show the comment)
  • Q Nozomi

    Because the "simple past" and the "future in the past" are both used for describing the past. It's useful for a language to describe an event that happens before, during or after a reference point in the past, present or future.

    Perhaps you know the "past perfect" tense which is about things that happened before a past reference (example, "I had eaten"). The "future in the past" is about things that will happen after a past reference.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Q Nozomi's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Q Nozomi's comment.
    in reply to DEEREMEYER1 (Show the comment)
  • DEEREMEYER1

    So why does the "narrative" oscillate between past tense and "future in the past" tense?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.
    in reply to Q Nozomi (Show the comment)
  • DEEREMEYER1

    Basically it's used to make a short story long. Instead of saying the "the plane is loaded to maximum weight", they say "the plane was at the maximum weight that it would ever carry". That's a significant difference and the extra fluff is completely unnecessary.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.
    in reply to Q Nozomi (Show the comment)
  • DEEREMEYER1

    I don't remember learning about a "future in the past" tense when I was in school taking English every year for 12 years. Must be something they ginned up to explain this completely stupid way of speaking.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DEEREMEYER1's comment.
    in reply to Q Nozomi (Show the comment)
  • Q Nozomi

    He is not using the simple future tense but the "Future in the past" tense (Google it, first result).

    The narrator is using the video to set the flow of the storytelling. Before the acceleration occurs (in the video) the narrator wanted to refer to Cashman's intention to accelerate - something that has not yet happened in the story (even though the whole story is set in the past). To convey this properly, he correctly uses "would accelerate."

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Q Nozomi's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Q Nozomi's comment.
    in reply to DEEREMEYER1 (Show the comment)
  • Minwir AlGhamdi

    if its not BOEING iam not flying!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Minwir AlGhamdi's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Minwir AlGhamdi's comment.
  • GeneralKenobiSIYE

    Whoa! Somebody install brake ducts from open wheel racing on those, quick! Needs the flowing air to help cool them down. CART's brake disks would get over 1,500F under hard braking after a fast straight.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GeneralKenobiSIYE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GeneralKenobiSIYE's comment.
  • Matthew Shields

    Was this at Vandenberg Air Force Base?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Matthew Shields's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Matthew Shields's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later