Boeing 777 rejected take off (RTO)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like avvideos's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike avvideos's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add avvideos's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Oct 26, 2007
For certification purposes, Boeing 777 made this test to show that it can stop safely at maximum thrust, by the end of the runway, taxi for 5 minutes (the time needed for the firetrucks to reach the plane) and not catch fire from the great heat produced from the disk brakes. Very educative, enjoy. http://aviation-videos.blogspot.com/
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
0:23
Boeing 767-400 thrust reverser test.by Luis GustavoFeatured
2,106,602
-
5:01
AA Boeing 777 Takeoff FULL POWER Take Off INTENSEby rkhanji
1,701,348 views
-
2:31
Boeing 787 Stall Testsby maganda1971
304,055 views
-
3:40
General Electric Biggest Jet Engine for B-777by Ramin Aminloo
359,490 views
-
1:41
Twin Otter - Engine failure on take-offby golfcharlie232
455,177 views
-
200
videos
Play all
Planesby moonros21
-
2:20
Close call!by jerrabomb
4,155,245 views
-
2:00
Emirates Economy class menu & mealsby francaiskoweit
225,592 views
-
1:33
Boeing 777 tailstrike (VMU Test)by buybygb
242,212 views
-
8:29
Airbus A340 600 Rejected Take Off Test Flight..by Jesus Fernandes
21,039 views
-
1:48
Rejected Takeoffby Mohamed Fadhil
143,067 views
-
5:56
Heavies landing at Sydney. Boeing 777, A-320, Airbus A-380, Boeing 747 by Daniel Collinsby flightlevel350
380,984 views
-
Emirates Boeing 777
4 videos2K
-
2:43
Emirates 777 Fast LANDING/STOP (Wow!) 23R | MANby mcpcshowcaseHD
2,752,927 views
-
9:37
Engine Failureby Katharina Peter
561,440 views
-
2:27
Rejected Take Off (Engine Fire) - TAP A321by Manuito
150,203 views
-
10:00
777 Boeing AA Takeoff take off- SPEAKERS ON MAX - LAX to LHR - THE BESTby onecunningfox
782,894 views
-
4:26
Boeing 747-300 from Pakistan International Airlines - PIA at Ringway/Manchester Intl Airport by Simon Loweby flightlevel350
2,863,510 views
-
0:58
MD-87 tail strike (VMU) testby TJ Dozier
82,622 views
-
3:01
Boeing 777by Martin Gomez
114,841 views
-
2:50
Boeing 747 Rejected Takeoff in Cape Town - British Airwaysby IrishPlaneSpotter
822,262 views
-
5:36
A380 Blade Off Testby Manuito
1,736,055 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
Zelin Xu 1 year ago
777 did way better than A340-600
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
dmaddles 1 year ago
boeing, doing it better since 1916
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Video Responses
All Comments (434)
DEEREMEYER1 3 weeks ago
Things that happened after a past reference still happened in the past and there is no need for a "future in the past" tense.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Q Nozomi 3 weeks ago
Because the "simple past" and the "future in the past" are both used for describing the past. It's useful for a language to describe an event that happens before, during or after a reference point in the past, present or future.
Perhaps you know the "past perfect" tense which is about things that happened before a past reference (example, "I had eaten"). The "future in the past" is about things that will happen after a past reference.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
DEEREMEYER1 4 weeks ago
So why does the "narrative" oscillate between past tense and "future in the past" tense?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
DEEREMEYER1 4 weeks ago
Basically it's used to make a short story long. Instead of saying the "the plane is loaded to maximum weight", they say "the plane was at the maximum weight that it would ever carry". That's a significant difference and the extra fluff is completely unnecessary.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
DEEREMEYER1 4 weeks ago
I don't remember learning about a "future in the past" tense when I was in school taking English every year for 12 years. Must be something they ginned up to explain this completely stupid way of speaking.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Q Nozomi 4 weeks ago
He is not using the simple future tense but the "Future in the past" tense (Google it, first result).
The narrator is using the video to set the flow of the storytelling. Before the acceleration occurs (in the video) the narrator wanted to refer to Cashman's intention to accelerate - something that has not yet happened in the story (even though the whole story is set in the past). To convey this properly, he correctly uses "would accelerate."
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Minwir AlGhamdi 1 month ago
if its not BOEING iam not flying!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
GeneralKenobiSIYE 3 months ago
Whoa! Somebody install brake ducts from open wheel racing on those, quick! Needs the flowing air to help cool them down. CART's brake disks would get over 1,500F under hard braking after a fast straight.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Matthew Shields 4 months ago
Was this at Vandenberg Air Force Base?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube