ICC Hearings: Uhuru Defence

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,939
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 28, 2011

PLEA OF INNOCENCE: Kenyatta: Ocampo witnesses are professional extortionists. Kenyatta: Prosecution evidence not credible.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Honestly, there is a difference between Kenyatta's Defense Team and Sang's Kitwa Kigen. One will get you hanged anywhere but Kenya. The other will get you free anywhere but Kenya.

  • Uhuru's appeal for peace was long after the Naivasha and Nakuru massacre. At that point in time, he already knew the ICC had Kenya in the loop.

  • Ocampo has based his case on 'criminal extortionist witnesses' -I like the way Ms. Higgins says it. Ms Higgins is breaking down the prosecution's case with so much ease like a knife cutting through butter.

    As usual, Ocampo is conspicuously absent...probably shopping for new witnesses. He has been avoiding the chamber like a leper...mhhhh, one wonders why?

  • why is a white man even in this court house... AFRICA YOU HAVE DIS RESPECTED YOUR FOUNDING FATHERS!! THEY LOOK DOWN UPON US WITH SHAME!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more