Antenna drops first

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
40,400
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 3, 2007

...and other impossible physical "reactions".

OutTake from "911 The explosive reality"
http://www.livevideo.com/video/911Revolution/26BF72E1A3424A57A9679B84BA6FF63B...

  • likes, 24 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to No Planes In New York
see all

All Comments (203)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dimitri Khalezov from ex-sovjet nuclear intelligence program said the plan to bring the WTC down with thermonuclear demolitions existed since the 70`s cuz when they built it they also had a plan how to bring it down safe at the end of it`s lifetime.

    NIST report didn`t test the debris for explosives, but scientists found out that the Tritium level was high above normal. The tests for explosives from foreign scientists are not relevant to US

  • @yearginclarke my mistake for calling you a moron. but think about how much those 30 floors weigh in a building built like WTC was. Built with a core and a good portion of the load was distributed to the walls thats how they has so much floor space. Once those walls go there are no supports on the floors to support the weight. the core was useless as it was cut in half by the plane.

  • @buffaloSabrespommy My point was that any object colliding with another encounters resistance to a certain degree depending on circumstances, whether or not it is a 110 story 1 acre building. Yes, that is huge, but you got to figure that the remaining building below had equal mass and floors that were designed to hold many, many times more weight than that, static or dynamic load.Columns were thicker in lower floors. How does 12-30 stories not lose energy as it progresses 90 floors downward?

  • @yearginclarke hey moron this was a 110 ten story behemoth, not a fuckin oak tree

  • @LOLYouGotTrolled666 And yes Tower 2 was weakened on the side that it leaned, but WHY did it not continue to fall OVER. I am a logger that works with fallers, and I have seen countless trees fall over once they lean to that degree, there is no stopping the fall sideways unless they get hung up in other trees, I.E., resistance. The only way the top half would go straight down is if the path of most resistance was continually eliminated below it during it's fall. Resistance is a strong force.

  • @LOLYouGotTrolled666 Nope. The official government reports themselves have stated that the plane impacts destroyed 15-20% of the core columns, and the remaining FIRES caused the already "weakened" portions to be subject to "inferno" tempertatures which, according to them, took the buildings down.No WHOLE floors were destroyed, only fractions, fractions that were designed to have weight distrubuted evenly if any columns were taken out, provided not too many were destroyed at 1 time.

  • There was a plane 'on' building 7...learn something new every day

  • @fluffyandpuffy K building 7 did not fall because of "isolated office fires on several floors at different locations throughout the building". It fell because there was a motherfucking plane on it, thats why. And it falls straight down because the bottom of the building is still solid intact. How do you expect it to fall crookedly if the bottom of the building is solidly anchored into the ground? Hahaha

  • the middle of the building would go first, and where is the antenna

  • @leelow1000 xD you ar funny! They mean the antenna drop first, because the core collapsed first(meaning the cor was blown up)! Btw, even FEMA agree with that!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more