School Bully Gets Beat Up!
Uploader Comments (alyosha24601)
Video Responses
All Comments (63)
-
@AletheAce I think somebody needs to go back to their mommy and learn some manners.
-
@xIad4mIx I believe in science 100% and would be happy to discuss creation science with you. Science actually developed out of a Christian worldview and I'm all for it. What I do not support is evolution - a quack science without foundation which merely rests upon a naturalistic worldview. Frankly, most people quickly hurl insults on my channel but won't actually discuss the science of the issues. Want to talk about DNA, reproduction, mutation rates, Lucy, ATP motors, polonium halos, or fossils?
-
The very fact we are having this arguement is because of 'science' and its advances, the internet isn't a 'gift from god' its a gift from science. Open your ratings so you can see how we all feel
-
but because I have never heard or witnessed any evidence for God. I am joining the army, I will spend my whole life bowing down to people, it doesn't affect me. There is so much science that we have discovered in the past 200 years, that it spans millions of books, and yet religion in the last 2000 years has spanned around 10 books. If you can give me direct evidence other than "there must be a creator for a creation" then i'll accept your arguement as fair.
-
Maybe the big bang was put through the bible, I accept that, but there is no evidence to support any religion. If have to have a religion, it is science. There doesn't have to be a creator, and evolution doesn't have any evidenct against, and massive amounts for it, there has never been a miracle, and any of the recent ones have been disproved. Although your comment to Ronthemoron made me laugh massively, i resist god not because i don't like the idea of bowing down to someone PTO
-
I suppose this may be a late, late response to the topic that has ended, but the argument on one side is fallible due to the misconception that "Scientific" study is relevant as Science is diversified by the beliefs and ideals of the people who practice it. Any one study could be accepted as the truth based on the individual who chooses to. This means that even were there a "scientific study" proving one thing, it could be denied by the individual such as yourselves.
-
@ronthemoron I'm sorry I do not converse according to your rules. For me, this issue cannot be contained in an intellectual or scientific box. I consider it a life and death issue. Thanks for commenting.
-
@alyosha24601 Alright since you're going to start with the straw-man arguments and completely destroy any further possibility of having an intelligent conversation; I'm going to have to say goodbye to you now. So, bye.
I suppose this may be a late, late response to the topic that has ended, but the argument on one side is fallible due to the misconception that "Scientific" study is relevant as Science is diversified by the beliefs and ideals of the people who practice it. Any one study could be accepted as the truth based on the individual who chooses to. This means that even were there a "scientific study" proving one thing, it could be denied by the individual such as yourselves.
Randomblade1990 5 months ago
@Randomblade1990 You are correct to a point, but there is also a point in science where interpretation merges into fact. At that point, the only strategy remaining is to ignore the facts. I believe the scientific evidence opposing the evolution religion is overwhelming. C-14 in diamonds, no fossil transitional species, and the presently observed deterioration of DNA are facts that just can't be ignored. There are about 100 facts contradicting the evolution myth. Thanks for commenting.
alyosha24601 5 months ago