What is Technocracy? Part 1

This video is an introduction into a deeper field of study. Do some digging of your own and you'll be surprised how much you'll find.

"The bargain struck between the foundations and the social scientists increasingly involved the State and shifted the balance toward the practical, technocratic side of the efforts to increase social control... Rockefeller philanthropy facilitated and pushed the social control ideology in this direction... In this way, philanthropy exercised a fair amount of control over the bridging that occured between social scientists and government..."

-- Donald Fisher, Fundamental Development of the Social Sciences

Information on the Reece Committee:

watch full documentaries at www.daroom.info

Category:

Education

Tags:

• what
• is
• technocracy
• new
• world
• order
• social
• engineering
• rockefeller
• reece
• committee

[hoser4]

I found the photos of Technocracy Inc. meetings absolutely laughable. TechInc has nothing what-so-ever to do with docile populations, nor control over the people.

This video completely misrepresents genuine technocracy.

Once again, the NWOers, fascists, etc. are keen on subjugating a word for their own uses.

[TBonePickensetc]

Uh oh... another attack by the lizard heads.

No doubt we will have to load these people up and transport them to the FEMA camps... ha ha.

N.W.O. lizard head crackpots.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc In short man, before calling me -- a RADICAL REVISIONIST who is ANTI-CORPORATE mainstream, look at yourself. You are just the product of physiocratic defunction, environmentalist propaganda, and what else. So much fail. I do not know why I thought you had a brain. Maybe I was stupid enought to believe that 'Technocrats' used 'science and logic'. Seems you are just another brand of ideologes.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc "Oh yeah, I can not win an argument, so I will use ad hominem and run away!" Dude, do you know what is mainstream? YOU. Screw Technocracy, it is a failed system, it is wetpainted SOVIET COMMUNISM. But oh wait, you are just another ideologe, so you see everything in black and white, and since I am not an idiot to buy your false ideology, then I am the enemy.

Have a good day.

[TBonePickensetc]

@11RisingPhoenix I am not interested in exchanging ideas with you. Your obviously mainstream. Its too late for special interest groups to pfuck up society any more and resources dwindle. Again your just following information you thought of previously and Technocracy ideas are unrelated to what your talking about. Not interested now in your further comments. Go to some libertarian site or something. Bye.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc My second point is, Technocracy "uses energy accounting to measure resources to population, and in theory this works because we are able to produce energy in relatively cheap & automated (and safe) ways, but in practice, you can not fed anyone with energy alone, nor you can teach/train/work/etc. Energy is an important part of our reality itself, but it is not matter, and we can not turn it into matter. Not yet, at least.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc I am not saying Capitalism is perfect -- I am not a Capitalism. My point is, Central Planning is unsustainable and will inevitably fail, because we lack a true method of -- for lack of a better term "unity" to fully maximize the efficiency of such a system. We are a social species, but not part of a hive-mind.

Large corporations are bad, do not get me wrong, but planning done by individuals for individuals is far better than committes/councils/central plans.

[TBonePickensetc]

@11RisingPhoenix I have no clue as to what you are talking about.... its moot anyway and does not fit or apply. The technate design is a science based social system. It uses energy accounting to measure resources to population. Capitalism as given by Corporations is about as centrally planned as to global corporatocracy as is possible so your point is lost.... if you have a point. Other wise look at a place like 'TechnocracyTechnateorg'' for more info.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc I took a time to read the sources you cited. With that in mind, both you and I are correct: I am not a Technocrat, nor you support a "Stalinist Dictatorship".

However. Besides the failures of Central Planning (which, unsurprisingly, Biophyisical economics made no attempt to redeem), Technocrats seem to believe that the entire system is entropic. This is wrong. The universe is anti-entropic. The growth of the human populace is also anti-entropic.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc OK, bad choice of words. I meant to say it was not the "Global Stalinist Dictatorship One-Pary Mind Control" the NWO crowd says it is.

[TBonePickensetc]

@11RisingPhoenix Again stop talking about this. Your uninformed. It is a Central planned economy made o of Sequences of governance.... its a classic governing system. Google 'Encyclopedia of Earth biophysical economics' for more information.

[11RisingPhoenix]

@TBonePickensetc Hey, no need to take it at a personall level. Also, I already know what a Technocracy is. Point was, a bunch of "TECHNOCRACY IS NWO!!!111" videos I have seen portray Technocracy as a Central Planning system. It is not.