Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Is Graffffik correct? The Argument against Christianity from Pagan Parallels revisited

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
841 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 16, 2010

This video attempts to provide empirical
and primary sources in response to
Aaronk1994's challenge about
pagan parallels in regards to Christianity.

http://platopagan.tripod.com/resurrection_of_horus.htm

http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Books/Papyrus_Ani.html

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Dhorpatan)

  • "2700 years before the Bible"

    That would place the Epic of Gilgamesh at 4200BC. LOL. 2000+ years off.

  • @smartwarlord

    I'll inform Grafffik right away by PM about what you just said, and see if he has anything to say about it, or whether he concedes you are right.

see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @smartwarlord

    OK now I know you're just a troll. You insult "liberals" instead of citing sources. Shut up, troll.

  • An interesting read through; thanks for posting. Incidentally, although it's a bit rough around the edges(how wouldn't it be?) I would need to side with graffffik here; just go where the evidence leads. You can't bring in a personal bias.

  • Testing 1 2 3 4

  • Epic fail aaronk1994.

    You finally lose, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

  • 100s if not 1000s of scholars date The Torah to 1500-1400BC, some take it back as far as 1700BC.

    They also date Job to 2000-1800BC.

    Liberals are not scholars.

  • @Heathenfidel I'm pretty sure I have to drop the entire set of pyramid texts up on his head for him to get a clue that's at pyramidtextsonline . com

    that would be several tons of etched into stone words by The Egyptians

  • @aaronk1994

    What, now a citation of a primary source, which is what you asked for, is not good enough? What does he have to do, hit you in the face with an actual ancient Egyptian stone tablet?

  • @stupid warlord

    Bible scholars date the oldest books of the Old Testament at around 1000BC, except for some of the more heretical ones who date it at about 900BC. 1500BC is an ass-pull. The newest book was around 100AD, so it's about a 1000 or 1100 year span.

  • smartwarlord, if you are going to pull a number out of your ass, pull one that is at least slightly plausible, instead of 50,000.

  • Oh please badism as if your reasearch is perfect a bible altered billions of times

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more