Father of all Dynasties
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (131)
-
@FischerFan, if yer talking Montreal reigns then it all started in 1893. Montreal AAA, first team to win the actual Sheffield made punch bowl. Thank the Lord and not the tool eh Stanley...
-
@jocolope Actually, Montreal's Stanley Cup reign began with an exhibition game in Philadelphia in 1975.
The Canadiens beat the Flyers 6-2 in Philly; but in the third period, the Canadiens kicked the daylights of them in a bench-clearing brawl. After the game, Schultz and the Flyers knew they were in trouble.
One Canadiens player recalled, 'We won the Stanley Cup that night. It just wasn't official until the next May".
-
@BobbyOrrMOTHERFUCKER, yeah Mtl was defeated going for 5 in a row in 80 by the North Stars but Lafleur was injured and there was no redemption in 81 when the Oilers knocked them off in 3 games straight in a best of 5. Calgary is the only visiting team in the NHL ever to carry the Cup on Mtl ice in 89 returning the favour from 86.
-
The birth of the Habs 4 straight in the late 70's was the 75 New Years Eve 3-3 game vs the Red Army when nationalistic pride and heart became the key factor. Also the Habs teams of the 60's during Beliveau's captaincy are underrated today. Beliveau proves it with his last of his 10 cups in 71.
-
SORRY!!! THE FATHER OF AL DYNASTIES ARE THE BOSTON CELTICS 8 CHAMPIONSHIPS IN A ROW, THAT WILL NEVER EVER BE MATCHED , NOT IN THIS DAY AND AGE!!
-
I find it ammusing when people say "well Montreal won all they're Cups when there was only 6 teams, not true from 1967 when the leauge expanded to 18 teams. Up until now they have won 10 cups in this order 68,69,71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93. Last canadian team to win the cup, an they will bring it home agian soon.
-
ahh...those were glorious days.....now I'm a Canucks fan...Go nucks Go
-
The roadrunner was like 37 when he retired and barely played in 79. The reasons they didn't win again in 80 had more to with losing Dryden and Lemaire. By the way, since maybe you're French I just wanted to say that "and having small dicks" as you wrote is wrong. It's "and have small dicks". Too bad French is faggot language which makes even the most masculine men who speak it sound like they either suck dick or take it in the ass
-
The Canadiens deserve their place in history as a dynasty. They were an excellent team, maybe the best. But that rule where the Habs retained the rights the two best French-Canadian juniors was unfair and the fact that since 70 they've only won 2 cups shows to some extent how them not having a monopoly over the best talent has made them a normal franchise. No one can question the dedication of Pollock , Bowman, Blake, and so many others, however the playing field was unlevel back then.
-
5 straight Stanley Cups in 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960.
4 out of 5 Stanley Cups in 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969
4 straight Stanley Cups in 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979.
The Islanders and Oilers had their dynasties, the Canadiens had THREE dynasties!
Bowman was power. Pollock was power. The Molson family was all money. Montreal is all power. Hockey is all power. Baseball, Football and Basketball is for cheap men who love steroids and having small dicks. And they get the busty women who obviously have silicon tits. The Canadiens dynasty was the best of everything, no doubt. I seriously dont think they were ever "properly" defeated. They calmly came down, as Lemaire, Roadrunner and Dryden retired at the same time. Nobody fucking defeated them.
BobbyOrrMOTHERFUCKER 2 years ago 10
Heres a defence comparision of the two dynasties.
76-79 Canadiens
Reg Season - 2.29 GAA Playoffs - 2.05GAA
80-83 Islanders
Reg Season - 3.07 GAA Playoffs - 2.81 GAA
You would think, since the Habs opposition was strong in the playoffs that their GAA would have gone up. Not so. It actually improved, which is the most amazing stat of all. Especially against those tough Flyer, Islander and Bruin teams. The Isles defence improved (of course) because they face weaklings quite often.
HisMajestyBobbyOrr 2 years ago 6