Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Logic A

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
581 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 19, 2008

Part One of Two

A brief, (but not under ten minutes, unfortunaletly) look at the basic elements of rational thinking.

Comprehensive review:

http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/index.htm

Occam's Razor (principle of unnecessary plurality)

http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/General/occam.html

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (DynaCatlovesme)

  • i love logic...

    all celestial bodies are made from green cheese.

    the moon is a celestial body.

    therefore: the moon is made from green cheese!

    ;-)

  • HA HA!

    All balloons are full of hot air

    Troy Riser is not a balloon

    therefore Troy Riser is not full of hot air!

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • so this seeming absurdity can be corrected with the insertion of ifs and thens:

    If universal axiom

    if existential axiom

    then conclusive deduction

  • the first universality can be disproved with one existence of an immortal man.

    there is a ubiquitous example of A void set where the two assumptions are:

    All men are shaved by the barber(who is a man)

    no man shaves himself

    so the conclusion cannot be derived since the barber is a man , so if one axiom is true the other is naturally false. This is a void set since no matter what the truth input, the conclusive deduction cannot be made.

  • if A(all celestial bodies are made of green cheese) then B( the moon is made of green cheese

    if not A then maybe B or maybe not B.

    The if statement is not satiated and thus the then may or may not be realized since A is sufficient but not necessary for B.

    in conclusion when your axiom-s is-are wrong then there is no conclusion.

    Aristotle's (Aristotelean) syllogism is:

    all men are mortal

    Aristotle is a man

    therefore Aristotle is mortal.

  • hypothetical syllogism: A rule of inference.

    But it is criticized for that reason exactly: axioms-premises-assumptions can be wrong sans defective logic.

    logically: The axiom that all celestial bodies are made from green cheese can be easily refuted and thus you have a void set and your conclusion is never reached.

  • ooo... this is very tempting, but i think i'll exercise discretion (for once). :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more