Michael's response to Conservative personal attack ads.
Top Comments
All Comments (12)
-
Good of you to spend your incredible comic talent on such a challenging topic. It would have been so much easier for you to chose an easy target: to mock Harper.
-
Iggy's team insults all Canadians by trying to deflect us with a sophmoric, non-sequitur, strawman response. How many Canadians working in Israel or Russia on a contract have made dozens of speeches and op-eds pretending to be a Russian or Israeli themselves? That would be immediately seen as either delusional or fraudulent behaviour. Watch Ignatieff : Caught on Tape (our video) to see what this guy really thinks.
-
PATHOLOGICAL "WE AMERICANS" LIEING IS THE ISSUE, more than his 34 years away. That kind of repititious publicly stated lies (hundreds of times) is a classic symptom of psychopathy. Either he is 100% delusional or he thinks the public are complete idiots, take your pick.
-
He is such a goon for even trying to connect this to 'new Canadians' - what a jerk.
-
Great Job!!!
Nice Work!!!
Crutucizing the other party isn't a "personal attack". A personal attack would be saying "Stephen Harper is a warloving homophobic tight-ass"(which would also be an accurate statement).
And I say this as a person who would vote NDP, not Liberal, if I lived in Canada
KennBurch 2 years ago 4
Criticism of a party or a leader for a political position is not a personal attack. A personal attack is when you criticise a _person_ for something _personal_ like, say, where he lived when not involved in politics. If I said (and I'm not) that Harper's patriotism should be questioned because he attended university in Alberta, that would be a personal attack. Saying that Harper is wrong on his position on Khadr is not a personal attack. Get it? Other than that, this video made me chuckle.
klaxon5961 2 years ago