Virtual Machines versus Physical Servers
Top Comments
All Comments (15)
-
I think he farted at 0:36
"I just added another virtual..."
-
>Implying VMware is the mac of servers
>Mac sux
-
Virtualization sucks, real men have real servers for every conceivable function plus redundancy. . For all the extra headaches and effort put into admining real servers its worth it. There is nothing like commanding a roaring data-center throbbing and surging with drives, lights and fans to let you know there is real power there. I move 100 Terabytes for breakfast. It's like running the USS Enterprise.
PS: Fuck the environment :D
-
"clt alt del" "clt alt del" - thats what happens when you run a server on Windoz! LOL
-
and... wait! I just jizzed all over
-
You can use Virtualbox for that, it is just free, so you don`t need to pay it, like you need for Vmware. ;)
-
They should reshoot this ad with girls. One could be really hard-working (the production server). The other could have multiple personality disorder (the vm server). Maybe Angelina Jolie could play that girl. Or they could just reshoot the whole thing with animatronic puppets where they open the head of the vmware puppet and there's a whole bunch of little puppets inside and they're like aaaargh! leap out at you, clawing your eyes, you run around screaming *aaargh* *they're clawing my eyes!**
-
they are better at programming than writing commercials.
Then you can make use of HA feature, where the Virtual Machines will be transfered to another server if the hosting server goes down.....VMware Rocks!!!!!!!
lpfcdd 3 years ago 3
egg on the face :)
actually, the vmware hypervisor backs up periodically, and can be just copied to another machine with VMware, and just boot... simbil ;P
sriram87 2 years ago