@Decentralism You don't even understand what a state is. It's a monopoly on force. You advocate a privatized state, one that would give the rich a total monopoly on force (even worse than they enjoy today). Private for profit military, private for profit police....it would be hell on earth with the capitalists greed as the pillars holding it all together. These things have existed in the past, look up the Pinkertons- they brutalized workers.
@Decentralism What you don't seem to understand is the entire point behind your ideology (although you don't realize it) is to create a private state that only capitalists control. If your "free" market society ever manifested in reality it would be hell on earth. Your ideology represents the interests of capital- mine the interests of labor- the two are oil and water.
@crud4 If you are so confident in the point that capitalists need a state to control workers then we should work together to destroy the state, that way, workers will no longer be able to be controlled by capitalists.
@crud4 Man homesteads property. yr after yr he brings the yield to market and little by little accumulates savings. With the savings he purchases more effective tools that he did not have previously have. He eventually has many tools. The man's body after many years of farming weakens. A city boy who has just moved West is in need of work. The man decides to pay the boy a %age of the yield if the boy works the land with the tools purchased by the man. What went wrong here?
@Decentralism No, private property is when you use land, a tool or machinery to employ wage slaves. People using their own labor homesteading isnt private property. When we use the term private property we separate it from the term possession. The land would be their possession because they mixed their own labor with it. Try reading Proudhon's "What Is Property".
Nice video...
ianmathwiz7 2 months ago
The state = the God of atheists...
As far as twist endings go... I have to say, it's a pretty good one.
Fathoms2004 3 months ago
"If God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish Him."
-Bakunin
Unfortunately, the State exists.
voltairinedecleyre66 5 months ago
@Decentralism You don't even understand what a state is. It's a monopoly on force. You advocate a privatized state, one that would give the rich a total monopoly on force (even worse than they enjoy today). Private for profit military, private for profit police....it would be hell on earth with the capitalists greed as the pillars holding it all together. These things have existed in the past, look up the Pinkertons- they brutalized workers.
crud4 8 months ago
@Decentralism how u doin with them stats?
r0npaul4prez 8 months ago
@crud4 Can you please enlighten me as to how what I advocate is the creation of a state?
Decentralism 8 months ago
@Decentralism What you don't seem to understand is the entire point behind your ideology (although you don't realize it) is to create a private state that only capitalists control. If your "free" market society ever manifested in reality it would be hell on earth. Your ideology represents the interests of capital- mine the interests of labor- the two are oil and water.
crud4 8 months ago
@crud4 If you are so confident in the point that capitalists need a state to control workers then we should work together to destroy the state, that way, workers will no longer be able to be controlled by capitalists.
Decentralism 8 months ago
@crud4 Man homesteads property. yr after yr he brings the yield to market and little by little accumulates savings. With the savings he purchases more effective tools that he did not have previously have. He eventually has many tools. The man's body after many years of farming weakens. A city boy who has just moved West is in need of work. The man decides to pay the boy a %age of the yield if the boy works the land with the tools purchased by the man. What went wrong here?
Decentralism 8 months ago
@Decentralism No, private property is when you use land, a tool or machinery to employ wage slaves. People using their own labor homesteading isnt private property. When we use the term private property we separate it from the term possession. The land would be their possession because they mixed their own labor with it. Try reading Proudhon's "What Is Property".
crud4 8 months ago