QM1.5: The Free Particle - Calculating our wave packet
Loading...
Loading...
9:01
QM1.3: The Free Particle - Are continuous states physical?by donylee1,959 views- 7:16
QM2.1: Potential Step E ≥ V₀ - Solving the Schrödinger Equ.by donylee3,122 views
- 6:55
QM0.13: Wave Packetsby donylee3,483 views
- 3:59
QM0.2: Time Evolution of a systemby donylee10,303 views
- 9:01
QM2.7: Potential Step E ≤ V₀ - The strange evanescent waveby donylee2,066 views
- 11:00
QM0.4: "Square" Potentialsby donylee6,510 views
- 57:54
Lecture 3 - Predicates & Quantifiersby nptelhrd59,594 views
- 57:57
Lecture 13 - Relationsby nptelhrd29,910 views
- 8:43
QM3.3: Infinite Square Well - Unusual probability densitiesby donylee2,285 views
- 8:27
QM2.4: Potential Step E ≥ V₀ - Calculating R and Tby donylee1,788 views
- 0:48
Travelling Pulses (Wave Packets)by wolframmathematica284 views
- 9:28
QM0.9: Wave solutions and Energy levelsby donylee3,602 views
- 10:58
QM5.4: Tunneling - Further analysis of Tby donylee1,189 views
- 8:36
QM0.8: General Approach in solving problemsby donylee3,430 views
- 0:24
Wave Packet Dynamicsby wolframmathematica707 views
- 7:53
QM0.10: Continuity and Boundary Conditionsby donylee3,486 views
- 10:58
QM5.3: Tunneling - Penetrating the potential barrierby donylee2,742 views
- 0:22
gnuplot : koherent wave packet in x,y space (with delta pi/2)by PiotrJachimowicz2,998 views
- 9:21
QM4.4: Potential Barrier E ≥ V - Full transmission of part.by donylee1,350 views
- 8:47
QM0.5: Bound States - Properties of one-dimensional motionby donylee4,808 views
The Free Particle
AndDropCapend
Pen cap marker cap
donylee 10:22 / 10:36
Pen cap marker cap
Calculating our wave packet
thank you
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
The Free Particle
AndDropCapend
Pen cap marker cap
donylee 10:22 / 10:36
Pen cap marker cap
Calculating our wave packet
thank you
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
A Gaussian Wave Packet
GAutierMississippiKaliel
A Gaussian Wave Packet
QM1.4: The Free Particle
Quesadilla FromRestaurauT
La Fiesta Brava From SusaN
The Free Particle - CalculatiNg our wave packetwave
donyleeLee 5:45
packetwave
just say lays'
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
nice
blackspoty2 3 years ago
interesting. a lot of computation for such a simple case. about 40-50 minutes of lecture just to cover it! This is much easier to understand now that i've learned about the Gaussian integral which you used a few times. Next i need to learn more about Fourier transforms cause that's a little unclear to me. Now if you had not take t = 0, would the solution simple have had exp(-iEt/h) term in it? since that term is constant w/respect to k wouldn't it be unaffected by the integration?
simplystimpy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ahhhhh everything is so clear now....
not really
MichaelZycz 3 years ago