B.B. Warfield Answers Monica Dennington!

I already refuted Monica Dennington like a year ago, so I thought I would let everyone see what B.B. Warfield had to say about the nonsense Dennington brought up recently concerning the definition of Calvinism. Monica Dennington is a false teacher, and if you want to see my two part refutation of her, then click on the links below. I show how she mixes Law and Gospel together, thus rejecting Justification By Faith Alone.
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZU7Q613wbA&feature=channel_page
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPXjG9FJlFw&feature=related


In this video, I'm quoting from B.B. Warfield's article titled, "Calvinism."
Can you believe Warfield would have the audacity to identify himself as a...dare I say it...a Calvinist?!!!
Can you believe the nerve of some people?
Didn't Warfield realize you're not supposed to use the term 'Calvinism?'

***Disclaimer***
B.B. Warfield taught a form of theistic evolution, which logically contradicts the plain teaching of Scripture. In this matter, Warfield is plainly wrong, and he should have known better. Warfield's departure from Calvinism's teaching concerning creation should be condemned, not defended. I suggest Gordon H. Clark's teachings concerning the claims of scientific method. Clark knew and taught what Warfield failed to understand: science is useful, but never true.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Calvinism
• Warfield
• Monica
• Dennington
• Defending
• Apologetics
• Predestination
• Justification
• Lutheranism