ihsankekupz, are you a fuckin ignorant law student? The British settled in Sabah by entering into a contract of lease with the Sultan of Sulu. Your government knows it. In fact, when Malaysia gained independence from Britain it continued paying the rentals as stipulated in the contract up until today. You know in law that a lease negates ownership for why would somebody pay rentals if the property belongs to him? This is common sense. If you can't understand this then you're an idiot!
ihsankekupz, you're a freakin ignorant. Check your facts. Up until today , the Malaysian government is paying rentals to the Sultan of Sulu. The contract between the British government and the Sultan of sulu says "padyak" which in Malayo means rental but the government of Malaysia insists that it means "sale". You know for a fact that "padyak" means rental not "sale". You're a bunch of social climbers trying to pretend your rich pwe!
yeah IT IS!! at least, I'm not making crap to someone, saying that "being closer to blah blah doesn't mean that blah blah is lawfully belong to the blah blah" so lame! not even connected to what i have said!! a law student indeed! haha! from what learning center? haha!
why ask me to show evidences? you're a lawyer student right, it's your job.... or it's not!??!! hmmmm?? well, read sabah claim. if you're not convinced, you better ask your prime minister..
yeah exactly! but I did not say that it was Philippines' territory just because it is closer to Manila, like what you are insisting. you can't get the point.. if you're a real law student, you must know how to understand each statement and try not to repeal each fact just because you're an UNREGISTERED law student..
"as of 2004, the Malaysian embassy to the Philippines had been paying rental money amounting 6,500 RM to the heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu" try to ask Msian Govt. if this is true..
obviously u didnt type "Sabah belongs to the Philippines, because it is closer to Manila", but u mentioned "steal that piece of land from the Philippines". So? What more?
It was only 75% of the land was ruled by Sulu and another 25% was under Brunei (glad my place is in the Brunei territory, x Sulu, if not i'll be poorer). Did u ever study about how British take over the whole land? Until its independence?
sy org semenanjung malaysia,sabah sarawak adalah sebahagian dr malaysia..
philipin adalah jiran pd malaysia sme seperti indonesia & thailand...
mushimarao 1 year ago
@ihsankekupz i support you man
we share passion for history and we use it against our jealous neighbours
81bullets 2 years ago
@innfidel sabah belongs to sabahans
they chose malaysia
to hell with legal contract
people make laws
and people choose
81bullets 2 years ago
can shut ur fucking mouth !!!
u rubbish dumbass
go fuck dog a
Bboyaaron95 2 years ago
ihsankekupz, are you a fuckin ignorant law student? The British settled in Sabah by entering into a contract of lease with the Sultan of Sulu. Your government knows it. In fact, when Malaysia gained independence from Britain it continued paying the rentals as stipulated in the contract up until today. You know in law that a lease negates ownership for why would somebody pay rentals if the property belongs to him? This is common sense. If you can't understand this then you're an idiot!
innfidel 2 years ago
ihsankekupz, you're a freakin ignorant. Check your facts. Up until today , the Malaysian government is paying rentals to the Sultan of Sulu. The contract between the British government and the Sultan of sulu says "padyak" which in Malayo means rental but the government of Malaysia insists that it means "sale". You know for a fact that "padyak" means rental not "sale". You're a bunch of social climbers trying to pretend your rich pwe!
innfidel 2 years ago
yeah IT IS!! at least, I'm not making crap to someone, saying that "being closer to blah blah doesn't mean that blah blah is lawfully belong to the blah blah" so lame! not even connected to what i have said!! a law student indeed! haha! from what learning center? haha!
why ask me to show evidences? you're a lawyer student right, it's your job.... or it's not!??!! hmmmm?? well, read sabah claim. if you're not convinced, you better ask your prime minister..
KULATZ01 2 years ago
unregistered? aiyooo hahahaha...
stealing from the Philippine- it means that Sabah is owned by ur country. That's ur point!!! what more?
give us the evidence on the payment made the embassy
ihsankekupz 2 years ago
yeah exactly! but I did not say that it was Philippines' territory just because it is closer to Manila, like what you are insisting. you can't get the point.. if you're a real law student, you must know how to understand each statement and try not to repeal each fact just because you're an UNREGISTERED law student..
"as of 2004, the Malaysian embassy to the Philippines had been paying rental money amounting 6,500 RM to the heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu" try to ask Msian Govt. if this is true..
KULATZ01 2 years ago
obviously u didnt type "Sabah belongs to the Philippines, because it is closer to Manila", but u mentioned "steal that piece of land from the Philippines". So? What more?
It was only 75% of the land was ruled by Sulu and another 25% was under Brunei (glad my place is in the Brunei territory, x Sulu, if not i'll be poorer). Did u ever study about how British take over the whole land? Until its independence?
ihsankekupz 2 years ago 2