In this video conversation, Karl Giberson advocates for an understanding of the Creator that places more emphasis on his sustainment of creation and less on its origins.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The problem that I have with the whole video is that if I replaced the word "god" with "spaghetti monster" it would make more sense. Ramen. All hail his holy noodles.
I have no problem understanding the ultimate creative force as sustaining the essence of all things in and of the universe. To conceive of God as creator, *and* as the very substance of the Universe itself, is not illogical or beyond reason. To have energy and matter in union would be the ultimate of some sort fo divine expression. It is tying this ultimate expression of reality to a Moral Order that remains the final challenge of a "Logos".
@dohrehmee No it wouldn't. x)
thetraceur123 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The problem that I have with the whole video is that if I replaced the word "god" with "spaghetti monster" it would make more sense. Ramen. All hail his holy noodles.
dohrehmee 1 year ago
And all that drivel has what to do with science, or any understanding of the workings of our universe?
trog69 1 year ago
I have no problem understanding the ultimate creative force as sustaining the essence of all things in and of the universe. To conceive of God as creator, *and* as the very substance of the Universe itself, is not illogical or beyond reason. To have energy and matter in union would be the ultimate of some sort fo divine expression. It is tying this ultimate expression of reality to a Moral Order that remains the final challenge of a "Logos".
MrGBrooks9 1 year ago
Enlightening.
anXVI 2 years ago