The rapid depletion of fossil fuels and the rising sea level from the warming of the earth's atmosphere are converging to dramatically alter our future. Edward Mazria, founder of Architecture 2030,...
The rapid depletion of fossil fuels and the rising sea level from the warming of the earth's atmosphere are converging to dramatically alter our future. Edward Mazria, founder of Architecture 2030, unveils a new study of sea level rise showing fly-over 3D images depicting potentially calamitous coastal and national impacts. Series: "Frontiers of Knowledge" [12/2007] [Science] [Show ID: 13667]
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
this guy is a climate expert and clearly explains the climate change psudoscience probaganda pushed by governments, in an attempt to force hundreds of taxes on you.
it was him along with a huge group of climate scientists and other proffesionals that exposed this man made climate change fraud in kopenhagen which is why the treaty fell through.
I suggest as the water rises move away from the location, just as the polar bear did and will. Climate change is happening, will happen and humans can not effect the direction directly. Even if they could a tax ENFORCED by an already inept union of nations is NOT how you change the waste of resources and how we are polluting the earth. Environmentalism is a POLITICAL agenda. Wake up people. Be critical thinkers on info you believe and accept.
Indermühle et al. (GRL, vol. 27, p. 735, 2000),find CO2 lags temperature by 1000 years, using Antarctic cores. Fischer et al. (Science, vol 283, p. 1712, 1999) CO2 lags 600±400 yr during the last 3 glacialinterglacial transitions. Siegenthaler et al. (Science, vol. 310, p. 1313, 2005) find a best lag of 1900 years in the Antarctic data. Monnin et al. (Science vol 291, 112, 2001) find CO2 lags last interglacial temperature increase by 800 years.
The documentary you mention is described by the person who made it as 'polemic', it has been widely criticized by scientists and even by it's contributors. For instance Carl Wunsch, professor of oceanography "strongly disagrees with conclusions and how material was used" have a look at the second half of
"The American denial of Global warming"
To see how the corp lobby manufacture the anti science stuff. It is same people as argued ozone hole was myth, pro tobacco and asbestos. Look it up.
Man-made Global Warming is hyperbole. 150 years ago the Earth's atmosphere was 99% Nitrogen & Oxygen. 500 years from now it will still be 99% Nitrogen & Oxygen. Carbon Dioxide is on the low scale of green house gases. What keeps the Earth warm at night is moisture from good old water. Water vapor makes up 95% of all the green house gases.
@rusty1491 The physics is very simple, it is not disputed you bloody moron. If you are really still stuck whether CO2 causes warming then you are an idiot even to your own side go watch a mickey mouse cartoon or something
You give no facts just name call, at least dispute my original argument. The real truth is that (1) as a percentage humans add a minuscule amount of CO2 in the atmosphere & (2) Carbon dioxide is a poor green house gas compared to water vapor. If Carbon Dioxide were so dangerous Mars would be boiling like Venus. Mars is 95% CO2. Complete hyperbole.
@rusty1491 It is not being disputed. it is very basic physics. In simple terms. C02 holds onto energy and re radiates it though the night. This means that the Earth loses less heat to space. There is no mystery to this part of the science. We do not know for certain how such heating will affect the poles or the weather. we are finding out. It seems that it will be bad. Your argument is fail because it is based on pro oil corp pricks like Ron Paul wilfully confusing S02 and C02, they lie.
ALSO, there is SO MUCH EXTRA CO2 HUMANS ARE PUTTING INTO the atmosphere that plants simply cannot use any of this extra CO2 humans put in. It can't be used up anywhere but it does stay in our atm where wind currents push it around and cause it to collect in key areas (like polar ice caps), trapping in extra heat, which in turn causes glacial melting, in turn causing many other effects, including further heating+melting at the outer edges, sea rise, and increasing cold+snow pack at the center
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
this guy is a climate expert and clearly explains the climate change psudoscience probaganda pushed by governments, in an attempt to force hundreds of taxes on you.
it was him along with a huge group of climate scientists and other proffesionals that exposed this man made climate change fraud in kopenhagen which is why the treaty fell through.
al gore refuses to debate him
Indermühle et al. (GRL, vol. 27, p. 735, 2000),find CO2 lags temperature by 1000 years, using Antarctic cores.
Fischer et al. (Science, vol 283, p. 1712, 1999) CO2 lags 600±400 yr during the last 3 glacialinterglacial transitions.
Siegenthaler et al. (Science, vol. 310, p. 1313, 2005) find a best lag of 1900 years in the Antarctic data.
Monnin et al. (Science vol 291, 112, 2001) find CO2 lags last interglacial temperature increase by 800 years.
For instance Carl Wunsch, professor of oceanography "strongly disagrees with conclusions and how material was used"
have a look at the second half of
"The American denial of Global warming"
To see how the corp lobby manufacture the anti science stuff.
It is same people as argued ozone hole was myth, pro tobacco and asbestos.
Look it up.
If you are really still stuck whether CO2 causes warming then you are an idiot even to your own side
go watch a mickey mouse cartoon or something
it is very basic physics.
In simple terms.
C02 holds onto energy and re radiates it though the night.
This means that the Earth loses less heat to space.
There is no mystery to this part of the science.
We do not know for certain how such heating will affect the poles or the weather.
we are finding out.
It seems that it will be bad.
Your argument is fail because it is based on pro oil corp pricks like Ron Paul wilfully confusing S02 and C02, they lie.