Christian attempts to destroy Atheism SoG style! - The Atheist Experience #682

All hail teh Don and the man with the crown of marble!
The Atheist Experience #682 Sunday 7th November 2010
Streaming every Sunday 10:30 PM (GMT) - BE THERE OR BE SQUARE!
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/the-atheist-experience
Youtube channels related/devoted to atheists:
http://www.youtube.com/user/AtheistExperience
http://www.youtube.com/user/FFreethinker

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• atheist
• experience
• #681
• invisible
• miniature
• intangible
• unicorns
• Matt
• Dillahunty
• Don
• the
• Baker
• Christianity
• Christian
• God
• Jesus
• Allah
• Yahweh
• Islam
• Moohammad
• Muhammed
• Judaism
• religion
• burden
• proof
• and
• evidence
• atheism
• accurate
• correct
• shock
• of
• god
• skepticism
• magical
• in
• box
• ACA
• Atheist
• Community
• Austin
• theism
• theist
• sunderb00t
• atheists
• are
• baby
• eating
• satanists

[IAINoodle]

jesus was an intangible translucent unicorn, miniature in size, nothing more, nothing less

[vyshious]

@puffinlah Where exactly did they get proven wrong?..

[freakiest421]

@bassboy360 things can exist beyond our perception. so what about unicorn. does it exist ? unicorn is a product of human mind , a human fantasy. Yes it can exist (its not impossible), but there is no shred of evidence or slightest hint in favor of it. So there is no reason for it to exist. No reason to dedicate my life after that hypothesis.

[bassboy360]

We dont have definitive proof unicorns dont exist.

But we're pretty positive they dont because we cant perceive them.

We cant see them, hear them, taste them, smell them or touch them. We have only 5 senses. If we cant perceive it with these 5 senses then we assume that it doesn't exist. Just like your "God".

If unicorns turn out to be real, and we can perceive them we wouldn't need to "believe" they are real because its obvious that they are.

[JoseATurner]

I can't believe this idiot SoG thinks the Bible is evidence. Wait, he's a theist. I CAN believe it.

[midnightapalooza]

@ptango101 Your first comment I wont argue with. As you said, you have no dogmas of faith (though technically, you do, you cant believe in a god, otherwise, youre not an athiest). But still, the first comment describes your personal beliefs, which you are entitled to. So thats fine. But, your second comment is where you continue to misinterpret me.

[ptango101]

@midnightapalooza I also understand where you are coming from. You are defining atheism to fit your terms and the logical part of you is rejecting these terms. So we don't have to bring anything to the table but at the same time we do. Like what? please give me some indication of the type of evidence we do and don't have to produce.

[ptango101]

@midnightapalooza I am not the one trying to convince anyone of anything. You say there is a god and I don't accept your evidence. Your evidence is all I have to work with. I don't have a church or dogma. I can't say "here is the proof god doesn't exist". I'm not making a 100% statement either, unlike most theists. I have no idea that there isn't something bigger than us somewhere but I am fairly sure it isn't the ill defined judeo-christian god. That's my atheism.

[Donking595]

Matt is afraid of John! Matt has evolved into a chicken! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHa

[SquidRooster]

Great video, terrible captions.

[midnightapalooza]

@ptango101 No, yall still dont get it! TECHNICALLY, no you dont require evidence. By legal rules and debate rules, whatever, you DO NOT NEED PROOF. We, technically, do. BUT, if you want to be SUCCESSFUL in convincing us, then you do. Tell me what youre not understanding herd, guys. Im speaking plain English.