@P1eski Here's an article by someone that knows more about this than I do. ww w. godevidence. co m/2011/09/ why-evolution-cant-be-cited-as-evidence-against-god/
@P1eski Evolutionary science does not necessarily preclude the existence of God. Chesterton actually asserted that as a theory it does nothing to challenge the faith (he was a Roman Catholic; I'm very not) because God could create either quickly or slowly. I actually know a few Protestants that would affirm theistic evolution as the means of creation and have heard that the Vatican affirms evolution (though this is possibly third hand information)
@56BUICKRiviera "Many Scientists" have yet to come up with a sufficient answer to the Theo-dice problem, so let's hope for all our sakes that the sum total of existence isn't sentient because that particular entity would probably not be very nice. Assuming that it would give a shit, of course.
@DEMIGODofWAR7 don't know what you mean, but a scientific theory is no trifling matter. It requires rigorous proof and observation. Unlike vernacular English, it does NOT mean idea or supposition....
@56BUICKRiviera But Who or what? It's FASCINATING. And if A God, devised something as scary, dangerous, massive and complex yet necessary to our lives as the Sun- then who or what made THEM? I'm not scared of the Universe anymore. It gave us... us. lol!
@P1eski Here's an article by someone that knows more about this than I do. ww w. godevidence. co m/2011/09/ why-evolution-cant-be-cited-as-evidence-against-god/
eternalpunx 1 month ago
@P1eski Evolutionary science does not necessarily preclude the existence of God. Chesterton actually asserted that as a theory it does nothing to challenge the faith (he was a Roman Catholic; I'm very not) because God could create either quickly or slowly. I actually know a few Protestants that would affirm theistic evolution as the means of creation and have heard that the Vatican affirms evolution (though this is possibly third hand information)
eternalpunx 1 month ago
@56BUICKRiviera "Many Scientists" have yet to come up with a sufficient answer to the Theo-dice problem, so let's hope for all our sakes that the sum total of existence isn't sentient because that particular entity would probably not be very nice. Assuming that it would give a shit, of course.
Metamusik 5 months ago
I dont know if Im mad or glad I dont trip no more.
AdognamedOp 5 months ago
@DEMIGODofWAR7 don't know what you mean, but a scientific theory is no trifling matter. It requires rigorous proof and observation. Unlike vernacular English, it does NOT mean idea or supposition....
P1eski 9 months ago
03:36 MED- IIIIC!!
Noodles37UK 11 months ago
@56BUICKRiviera But Who or what? It's FASCINATING. And if A God, devised something as scary, dangerous, massive and complex yet necessary to our lives as the Sun- then who or what made THEM? I'm not scared of the Universe anymore. It gave us... us. lol!
Noodles37UK 1 year ago
Many scientists believe in a creator. The theory is some thing had to have a hand in creating time and life.
56BUICKRiviera 1 year ago 2
"the creator made two of everything"?
How old is this vid. Does it predate evolutionary science?
P1eski 1 year ago
He's like the Carl Sagan of biology. Great vid! Cool music too.
hornetpalooza 2 years ago