The Legend of 9/11 — 10 Years On

The Legend of 9/11 — 10 Years On by Anthony Lawson

This video concentrates on the two major 9/11 issues: The Unidentified Planes and The Controlled Demolitions. Nothing else. It does not mention the NORAD stand--down; the don't-fly and don't-go-to-work warnings or the Dancing Israelis or any of the other anomalies and suspicious happenings. The alleged amateur suicide pilots are not mentioned, either, for obvious reasons, and I do not know what happened to the allegedly hijacked planes or their alleged passengers and crews.

It is my contention that the 9/11 Truth Movement has got to concentrate on the most blatant and provable lies in the official story, and stop trying to be an amateur Police Precinct or a citizen's District Attorney's Office. The Movement must bring pressure to bear in the authorities for a new enquiry, so that the police, the FBI, the NTSB and all of the other law enforcement and investigative agencies can do what should have been done 10 years ago: Find out who was responsible for the crime of the attacks on 9/11 and bring them to justice.

While I was thinking about a video for the 10th anniversary of 9/11, an English artist named David Borrington got in touch, and asked if I would write and record some voice commentaries to be included in a set of prints that he was making for the same occasion. When I saw his strangely haunting artwork, I decided to incorporate David's images into my video. So, my sincere thanks go to David Borrington, whose website is www.davidborrington.com

I would also like to recommend that anyone who is interested in the research done on the Murray Street engine take a look at Christopher King's excellent web page:
http://ckpi.typepad.com/christopher_k...

Music: Adagietto - 4th Movement from Gustav Mahler's Symphony No.5

The author would also like to point out that he is not associated in any way with VT: the Veterans Today website.

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[Kiska Ivanov]

that was a beautiful dedication at the end to all the victims, including iraq. i would still like to see someone who makes these videos give their theories about the victims. people write pretty close minded comments about that, as if they didn't die. the theory of crisis actors does not work for me, because i grew up with tom burnett's neice..he was married to her mom's sister, who has talked about getting phone calls and has done interviews about it but i know she is legit. so where is he?

[Anthony Lawson]

I think one of the Loose Change versions included section about someone witnessing a plane at Cleveland airport when passengers were offloaded from one plane onto another.

I've just googled and come up with this:

"On the morning of 9/11 a little known Cincinnati television station ran a story saying Flight 93 landed at Cleveland International Airport instead of crashing in ..."

It seems plausible that people who were out to kill could have dumped a few more into the Atlantic. Who knows?

[Anthony Lawson]

With regard to the phone conversations, I think that voice morphing technology could have taken care of that issue, and there is the story about Mark Bingham asking his mother if he believe it was him, after beginning the conversation with: "Hi Mom, This is Mark Bingham." Who needs to give their mother their full name when telephoning them?

It's speculation, but not beyond the realms of possibility that the shock of what someone was hearing might cause them not to recognise a morphed voice.

[Anthony Lawson]

Unless the debris from planes is forensically identified to determine which planes actually crashed, no loved cannot possible know if their relatives were actually on the planes which crashed.

It is people with attitudes like yours who insult the memories of those who died and those they left behind but whose deaths have never been satisfactorily explained.

[Bongofury361]

While I'm with you on 911 & the holocaust being blatant hoaxes, this video appears to vindicate the very theory that you so adamantly & vehemently oppose...the NO PLANE THEORY!

If there's no evidence of any plane wreckage at any of the crash sites, & no evidence of any bodies alleged to have been on said planes, then one could rightly conclude that...THERE WERE NO PLANES!

Though we may not agree on a definitive theory, we're supposed to be on the same side, & shouldn't be attacking each other!

[corinthian7575]

part of the WTC wreckage was used to make the U.S.S NEW YORK an amphibious assault ship so lets just say the DOD helped to bury the evidence in a rather ''unique'' way.

[Anthony Lawson]

Why can't you meet the challenge? Give me one fact or issue that Simon Shack gets right. Just one, and not stuff like what times the planes hit, but what he actually uncovered.

The video clips look quite real, considering that most of them are off-air copies and most were shot by amateurs who had about 12 seconds. max. so camera adjustments were impossible.

Now stop generalizing and meet the challenge, or I will not approve another of your pathetic excuses made on behalf of a proven liar.

[Bongofury361]

Maybe you should explain why you've so vehemently attacked Simon Shack's analysis, or are we to assume that because his theory does not jive with yours, then he must be spreading misinformation &, thus, an enemy of the truther movement?!

In this video, you accurately point out that the plane debris could NOT have come from the alleged planes, so we must then assume it was planted...is that NOT a logical assumption?!

As a camerman, explain to me why none of the footage looks even remotely real?!

[Anthony Lawson]

Nor did I mention that you can buy hamburgers and pizzas in New York, but I know one can, and there are plenty of photographs showing plane debris, before it was spirited away by Mayor Giuliani.

You are a boring person, Bongofury361, because you are unable to back up anything you write about. Try this: Give me one fact or issue that Simon Shack gets right. Just one, and not stuff like what times the planes hit, but what he actually uncovered. He lied about many things.

There was no TV fakery.

[Bongofury361]

Nor did you state that there WAS any wreckage in NY, and the "basic mistake" you claim I and others have made, is due to your lack of clarity!

All the questions you've asked could be answered quite simply, IF THERE WERE NO PASSENGER JETS!

You've suggested that military jets or drones could have been used (which I think is likely), but that would have to be covered up by TV fakery, yes?!

September Clues, a great piece of analysis that you failed miserably to bust, clearly demonstrates this!

[Anthony Lawson]

I know. I started making a video about those programmes, which are a disgrace, but I gave up. There is just so much that an, individual can do his own, and I needed to get on with some other things. My life happened to be one of them.

[WOODiE4U]

Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’.