Does anyone else find his speech impediment distracting? Lucky for him I guess, otherwise he'd have been sniffed out as the bullshitter he his long before now... 'there is no nature'? Come on- my fishtank is deeper than this tit.
, to what i mean is that idealize our human capacity compared to the ecosystem nor is a way to understand nor much less face a specific problem, the question that i do is: the system leads to solutions or is a system idiot capable of providing idiots Things
Darwin would called a dominance hegemonico of race, putting the point of zizeck: comes a stupid and makes one another can prevail over the same, it seems to me an idea sensible but i think we think in idealizing the capitalism, is to develop the theory of idiot compared to the ecosystem, of what we are talking about are of concrete facts as that gases of greenhouses producing such things, fc'S certain other in the ozone layer
I get a problem with the idealization of the system, I try to explain that, imagine a world in other system way, the taking of more of them, then the consumerism is a reality, so also the consumerism provides an environment conducive to unravel our unimaginable habits to the time to buy, the point that I would say is that we cannot idealise the capacity of development.
good points - needing to let go of a idealization of nature to really confront the threats the it itself, and not the threats to an idealization of it.
Does anyone else find his speech impediment distracting? Lucky for him I guess, otherwise he'd have been sniffed out as the bullshitter he his long before now... 'there is no nature'? Come on- my fishtank is deeper than this tit.
ech1dna 1 year ago
, to what i mean is that idealize our human capacity compared to the ecosystem nor is a way to understand nor much less face a specific problem, the question that i do is: the system leads to solutions or is a system idiot capable of providing idiots Things
julsdcr 2 years ago
Darwin would called a dominance hegemonico of race, putting the point of zizeck: comes a stupid and makes one another can prevail over the same, it seems to me an idea sensible but i think we think in idealizing the capitalism, is to develop the theory of idiot compared to the ecosystem, of what we are talking about are of concrete facts as that gases of greenhouses producing such things, fc'S certain other in the ozone layer
julsdcr 2 years ago
I get a problem with the idealization of the system, I try to explain that, imagine a world in other system way, the taking of more of them, then the consumerism is a reality, so also the consumerism provides an environment conducive to unravel our unimaginable habits to the time to buy, the point that I would say is that we cannot idealise the capacity of development.
julsdcr 2 years ago
I like this guy
AzathothianBrew 2 years ago
Zizek at his best walking in an active dump! New way to produce an academic lecture. Zizek on Love.
JaiNote 2 years ago
threat *TO it itself
beefman550 2 years ago
good points - needing to let go of a idealization of nature to really confront the threats the it itself, and not the threats to an idealization of it.
beefman550 2 years ago
Zizek is on form here; I detect nothing of 'performance art' or any drift from class based politcal philosophy' in tis 10 minutes segment'
spitfirepilot 2 years ago 2
Hey conservatives:
Let's quote mine in Zizek and add him as a source that global warming is not happening at all and environmentalists are deluded Berkeley hippies.
RationalEmotive 2 years ago