Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

What this Skeptic Really Believes about Mike Adams - Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,217
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 26, 2010

In response to:
http://www.naturalnews.com/028012_skeptics_medicine.html

NOTE: I am not a medical professional, this is just my layman's opinion. If you find errors, please let me know.

WHO statistics:
http://www.who.int/whosis/en/index.html

Wikipedia article on Raw Foods Diet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raw_food_diet#Nutritional_deficiencies

Neuroscience and free will video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6S9OidmNZM

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (NeoDolph1n)

  • NeoDolph1n, I agree with everything you said except for 1 point. The high mortality rates in US births is more likely a result of the extraordinarily high rate of c-sections (about double what the WHO recommends) and other birth interventions such as pain medications and induction that are pushed on women in this country without mention of possible harm to the child. A natural child birth supervised by trained professionals is at least as safe for low risk women and is more common in Europe.

  • Fair enough :) I guess that was a bit of an unfair dig. In my defense, people like this(expletives removed) guy just make me (expletives removed) angry.

  • I have to disagree with you about natural childbirth, however. Both of my brothers were born by natural childbirth, completely without complications. My sister and I would have been also, but in our births my mother was literally forced to take ether, which could actually have CAUSED complications like vomiting. That it didn't was lucky but by no means typical.

  • I'm not saying natural childbirth always results in problems, not at all. I'm just saying that when it does (and it will, on occasion), it's a pretty good idea to have a doctor handy.

Top Comments

  • Wow this guy is the king of Strawman fallacy.

    We should nickname him the scarecrow.

  • No problem. My wife just had a supervised home birth 4 months ago, and we did a lot of research on the topic beforehand. Certainly, some births (maybe 10-15%) require interventions, and the lack of such interventions gives 3rd world nations high perinatal mortality rates. However, the European countries with lower mortality rates than the US tend to have home births MORE commonly than in the US, not less, and have doctors less prone to intervene or to get that baby out before the weekend.

see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @truthaddict1977 agreed ,the side affects of vaccines are so obvious now,.although it is sort of funny watching dumb people plug their kids with poison,and start crying once their boy has autism,"why did it happen.....why..why" ahhhahhhahha.....

  • im all for the NWO, its going to kill off all these sort of people. happy days

  • your obviously an idiot hoping to sway other idiots to your mode of thought. The H1N1 hoax is a prime exaample i hope you enjoy hell. Anyone can discount many of your arguments through independant research or by simply reading vaccine inserts sleep well and spend your cfr money wisely TruthAddict

  • Hypnosis (Old word, Hypgnossis or, to bring the word derivation home, "Hypo gnossis" - Know less or, Unknowing) is simply suggestion. It is voluntary action brought on by a self induced trance state where a mind is convinced to lower guards and accept otherwise unacceptable suggestions. It can be looked upon as an intoxicated state of mind, or of a partial sleep state. Can it be used for good purposes? Sure. If, and I say IF, you are a professional mental health expert.

  • We do not live in a third world country in the US or UK. Not yet, anyway. Using chlorine sparingly and only when needed should be the guide word here. If you need to use chlorine in your drinking water, you need to fix your infrastructure. Proof is that chlorinating drinking water is not a panacea (plenty of organisms are not affected) and chemical contamination is also a danger. Use it when you absolutely have to... as a response, not a prohylaxis.

  • 4:24

    I have to criticize your statement here. Having been to the third world (particularly in Latin America,) I can tell you that chlorinated drinking water is, doubtlessly, a good thing as a public health issue.

    Statistically, (if you look at the history of places in the third world or in the US,) places with chlorinated drinking water are much healthier with less disease.

    As for taste, it is not very noticeable if the chlorine is in a small enough quantity.

  • Skeptics don't believe things without evidence, or try to avoid doing this. That is all we can say about them and this is the only thing I'd have to say to Mr. Adams on the matter but good job anyway.

  • Place the mic next to your mouth, not infront of it. Makes your voice much more pleasant.

  • As I understand it, fluoride is naturally present in the water supply anyway, and the fluoride regulations sometimes require reducing the fluoride levels to the desired levels.

    So Adams should be completely okay with fluoride in the water, because it's there in nature. But I suspect that facts never had much influence on his opinions.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more