Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning
Top Comments
All Comments (22)
-
Actually classical conditioning is for example, training your dog to respond to the snack (CS) to a neutral stimulus like a bell.
-
My cat's name is Rocky, and I've also conditioned him too. :D
-
You are training your dog with food.
Conditionat means to fix n link the (subconscious) beavior of the animal or human with a automatic reaction, when it becomes a special input (not food).
-
Hey guy. Conditioning means not that a living beeing whats food.
It means you can conditionat a thing that is normely absolutly not interesting for the animal n makes no respond n reaction to its behavior.
For sure it whants food!
Pavlovs show us that he could conditionate the dog to the bell.
-
DUDE YOu are a LIFESAVIOR..thank YOU...VERY MUCH.
-
aww ur dogs so cute
and thank you this helped my differ both of the conditions!
-
It's not bribery then?!
Hasnt the dog got to offer the behaviour before he sees the reward?
-
Thank you for your experiment this has really helped me understand the difference.
-
when a dog knows how to "sit" from standing, it doesnt mean he knows how to "sit" when he lays down.
These 2 "sits" are 2 different commands, because of the totaly different muscle moves that have to happen in order to complete the move.
Classical Conditioning about LEARNED responses, not innate responses. Innate responses are what we call "reflexes", which can be defined by the reflex arc. Usually with enough successful shaping, you can involve intermediate rft's, instead of a constant rft schedule. You described operant conditioning very good, but the classical conditioning explanation was quite poor. The can-opener is a much better way of explanation of describing a Neutral Stimulus (NS), Conditioned Stimulus (CS), and a CR.
FendersRule 3 years ago 6
what an adorable puppy! :D
RadhaBlossom 10 months ago