>this video predicted the chinese J-20 two months before it leaked to the internet
With all my respect to China -- it's bogus. I mean if China can't build even 4th gen. fighter, how they would build the 5th? There are a lot problems: absence of constructors school and traditions of plane-building, absence of modern composite materials and electronics, and the main one -- abs. of even 4th gen. reliable engines. China buys it in Russia, because own engines is crap (~50 flight hours resource).
Su-35BM HAS super-man-ty, AESA radar ("Irbis"), Adv. El. Attack, sensors fusion (so called electronic cabine), ultra long range AAM and supercruise. It doesn't have only "stealth" scheme (angled shape) and internal bays, BUT compare the cost: Su-35 -- ~35-40mln, T-50 -- ~100mln, F-35 -- ~120mln, F-22 -- ~330mln in the US dollars. F-22 has no superman-ty, it's much more reduced, if to compare with Sus. So "by points" Su-35 looks the same as F-22 and much better than F-35.
Oh, pindoses always bastardizes names: [rafe:il] instead [rafa:l'] and "S U" instead Su ("soo"), because S and U are the first letters of the constructor's surname -- P.O. Suhoy.
"...no attacks since the Korean war, because" there was no strong opponent with sophisticated and numerous military aviation. That's why! Iraq and Yugoslavia/Serbia has 15-30 times less population and economical/military potential. Vietnam had no own air forces. Even with the Union's help it was much weaker (tens times), then the aggressor's aviation.
Also there is no surprise that rus. fighters were always better. The same for SAMs -- Russia was/is the indisputable leader in this tech.
I worked for a moving company in US, helped relocated dozens of US military officers (army, navy, airforce), and I've learned that they are educated like SIlentEagles. Doesn't matter if the truth is obvious, it only matters what they were thought, and most of the Americans are still been told that they have the best army and technology in the world, the best living standards. In fact, after just a simple visit to western Europe proves wrong. Anything on CNN is accepted as truth without checking!
AIR SUPREMACY UNDER THREAT FOR USAF AND USNF:
FIGHTERS:
-RUSSIA:(Su-50 FireFox, Su-35BM, Su-34, Su-33M, Su-30M2/MK1/MK2, Su-27SM, Mig-35, Mig-29K, Mig-29SMT, & Mig-31BM)
-CHINA:(J-20 Hidden Dragon, J-18 Sino Lightning II, J-15 Flying Shark, J-11B/BH Sino Flanker, J-10B Vigorous Dragon, & FC-1 Fierce Dragon)
SAM:
-RUSSIA:(S-500, S-400, S-300MPU2, S-300VM/V4, SA-22, Tor M2, & Buk M2)
-CHINA:(HQ-19, HQ-9, HQ-15, HQ-7, & S-300MPU1)
USAAIRPOWER 7 months ago
Build more F22s..Then export them to us (Australia).
ThaFunkster100 7 months ago
kick Obama out of office and get your fiscal house in order.... Build more planes...
Winston2004 8 months ago
>this video predicted the chinese J-20 two months before it leaked to the internet
With all my respect to China -- it's bogus. I mean if China can't build even 4th gen. fighter, how they would build the 5th? There are a lot problems: absence of constructors school and traditions of plane-building, absence of modern composite materials and electronics, and the main one -- abs. of even 4th gen. reliable engines. China buys it in Russia, because own engines is crap (~50 flight hours resource).
Nitrorus 1 year ago
+ wrong table on 11:40
Su-35BM HAS super-man-ty, AESA radar ("Irbis"), Adv. El. Attack, sensors fusion (so called electronic cabine), ultra long range AAM and supercruise. It doesn't have only "stealth" scheme (angled shape) and internal bays, BUT compare the cost: Su-35 -- ~35-40mln, T-50 -- ~100mln, F-35 -- ~120mln, F-22 -- ~330mln in the US dollars. F-22 has no superman-ty, it's much more reduced, if to compare with Sus. So "by points" Su-35 looks the same as F-22 and much better than F-35.
Nitrorus 1 year ago
Oh, pindoses always bastardizes names: [rafe:il] instead [rafa:l'] and "S U" instead Su ("soo"), because S and U are the first letters of the constructor's surname -- P.O. Suhoy.
Nitrorus 1 year ago
"...no attacks since the Korean war, because" there was no strong opponent with sophisticated and numerous military aviation. That's why! Iraq and Yugoslavia/Serbia has 15-30 times less population and economical/military potential. Vietnam had no own air forces. Even with the Union's help it was much weaker (tens times), then the aggressor's aviation.
Also there is no surprise that rus. fighters were always better. The same for SAMs -- Russia was/is the indisputable leader in this tech.
Nitrorus 1 year ago
this video predicted the chinese J-20 two months before it leaked to the internet
evasivemaneuver 1 year ago
I worked for a moving company in US, helped relocated dozens of US military officers (army, navy, airforce), and I've learned that they are educated like SIlentEagles. Doesn't matter if the truth is obvious, it only matters what they were thought, and most of the Americans are still been told that they have the best army and technology in the world, the best living standards. In fact, after just a simple visit to western Europe proves wrong. Anything on CNN is accepted as truth without checking!
biggestro 1 year ago
If China waits long enough, most of america will kill itself with obesity.
GuinnessGaz 1 year ago 2