Crash Test 2002 - 2005 Toyota Camry / Daihatsu Altis (Side Impact without Side Airbags) IIHS

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,322
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 17, 2008

Toyota Camry
2002-06 models
SIDE IMPACT TEST WITHOUT OPTIONAL SIDE AIRBAGS

OVERALL EVALUATION: Poor
Injury measures Head protection Structure/safety cage
Head/neck Torso Pelvis/leg
Driver Poor Marginal Good Poor Acceptable
Rear passenger Good Poor Good Marginal

Important: Side impact crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type and weight categories.
Test details:

The Toyota Camry was redesigned for the 2002 model year. Beginning with 2004 models, side structural changes were made to improve occupant protection in side-impact crashes. (Toyota reported that the structural changes would not significantly affect side-impact performance in models without side airbags; therefore the overall side impact rating for 2002-05 models without side airbags is the same.)

Two tests of the Camry were conducted, one with optional side airbags for the driver and rear passenger, and one without. These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structural ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests.
Injury measures:

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious skull fracture and/or brain injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. Rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would also be possible. In addition, loading to the shoulder was excessive.

Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. The risk of significant injuries to other body regions is low.
Head protection:

Driver — The dummy's head was hit by the intruding barrier, producing high head injury measures.

Rear passenger — The dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door and the window sill of the rear door. This pillar is required by federal standard to provide some protection for occupants' heads. The impact with the window sill did not produce high head injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i have this vehicle. shit.

  • Side Airbag's should of ALWAYS of been standard, because they make a remarkable difference if you were to into a car accident. If you have front/side/curtain airbags on a good safe car like this on in this video, then you could walk away from the crash without a scratch, and pick yourself up a happy meal from mcdonnalds right after the crash

  • POOR SCORE

    and seven years ago

  • Look at the other video, it's like day and night. Same car, but WAY different results with the side airbags.

  • Ouch, wouldn't want to be there

    Good thing that gen had side air curtains at least as an option

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more