Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,307
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 9, 2007

We have actively studied the questionable nature of the official version of what happened to our nation on September 11, 2001.Throughout the 1st year after 911 we ignored and did not believe those who asked us to question the official story.Like millions of Americans we believed America had been attacked by terrorists from abroad. Sadly, we are now convinced that rogue elements within our government committed a vicious criminal act against its own citizens for the larger purpose of swaying us to support both domestic and foreign policies mapped out in the late 1990's. 911 was Hitler's Reichstag fire of 1933 and Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor masterfully coordinated to achieve the desired ends of an imperialistic role for America in the world, patriotic support at home and the erosion of our constitutional rights. In a nutshell,the war on terrorism is a cruel hoax by a misguided, out-of-democratic control small group of individuals sabotaging the best of our values the World over!

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (150)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @edyken77 The real stubborn thing is the correct application of physics, not the half-truther convenient brand of physics. There is very little "fact" supporting controlled demolition. The truther take is that it was nanothermate (NT) that was used for demolition.NT is not concussive. NT would not pulverize concrete, nor eject steel columns. That might happen with a concussive material, such as used in typical blg demolitions. But it would also be accompanied by deafening explosions. Facts.

  • @Berkeley626 The crap that the "TM" trot out to hold up their positions knows no bounds!!. These people see what they want to see. No matter how many credible people you put in front of them or corroborated FACTUAL material.

    I have yet to converse with one of them not willing to toss just about anyone under the bus in order for their "position" to stand up. It goes on and on with this lot.

    I think they're all a little goofy. Either incredibly ignorant or stupid, I am not sure which.

  • @roquefortfiles DISINFO TROLL BLARG! Which WTC building are you referring to? WTC1 and WTC2 definitely do not look like your typical demolition. I doubt there has ever been a demolition on this scale, one which completely obliterates all the concrete into dust and launches the steel columns latterly for great distances. Also one that uses thermite is very different than any other demolition. But the fact remains that it was a demolition. Physics are stubborn things my friend. 

  • @edyken77  If you knew what you were talking about.

    Anyone who knows anything about CD can instantly tell the WTC looks NOTHING like a CD. It would behave entirely differently if explosives were involved. Same with 7. One charge capable of blowing a column would shatter the glass in 360 degrees around the building. It would do it with ease.

    One.. let alone 10 more.

    Silly theories and stories. Put out by people who don't know what the hell they are saying!!

    I have experience in this.

  • @roquefortfiles it starts with all 3 buildings that collapsed exhibiting all the tell tale signs of controlled demolition. Free fall speed means that it is not a collapse due to fire. It indicates many floors of support being removed within seconds of each other. It's not hard to wrap your head around, Mr. Disinfo.

  • Jeff King is a nutjob.

  • @nikto2000 Oh, you mean the thousands of structural engineers who support the official explanation know nothing about science or physics? Amazing that the buildings they design aren't collapsing left and right then. Surely you don't live in a building designed by one of them. Must be nice sleeping underneath the stars

  • To say one's an “MIT engineer” is to imply that one either teaches engineering at MIT or else otherwise worked for MIT as an engineer. Jeff King is not now nor has he ever been an MIT engineer (or research scientist), nor has he ever taught engineering or worked as an engineer for any university ever. He’s been a family doctor for at least 27 years and only received a joint biology/electrical engineering degree from MIT in 1974 to briefly work in medical devices before turning to medicine.

  • collective consciousness.. i love it.. keep it up.. one day.. we will all take down these criminals the same way they took down these buildings and the many unfortunate souls that were taken away as a result of this horrific act. the victims and their families deserve to know the truth.. and we'll get there together.

    the war on terror is a farce.. its the war on liberty that worries me.

  • @katana2012666 Every hijacker was confirmed on the aircraft with multiple corroborating sources (entirely credible sources!!).

    So if you got the hijackers flying the planes................. Where does all this "Conspiracy" stuff start?

    Its a load of nonsense dude!! explain it to me like I am a 5 year old. Where is the "START" point of this covert Gov operation. There has to be for your story to make any sense.

    Sorry.. It doesn't.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more