Evolution - Should it be Taught Critically? ( Part 3)

No description available.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Evolution
• creation
• creationism intelligent design
• scott
• miller
• Dover

[MaximusArurealius]

@daNDayati I also noticed that you were completely unable to dig your way out of the pwnage to yourself over Abiogenesis so you decided to start an argument over the roundness of the Earth. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR You are a typical pinheaded pseudo intellectual pretend science stuffed shirt snob.

OWNED AND POWNED

[MaximusArurealius]

@daNDayati Tell me something asshole? IS your granny one of those blue-faced, red-assed buttpicker monkeys?

[MaximusArurealius]

@daNDayati Dummass, learn how to properly use caps. OK dummass? OH and this "religious hit parade?" That's just another phony assed evotarded straw man. We know you have hit the limit of your ability to defend your childish asinine evotard theory when you pull out the religion card. You science is finished and NOW YOUR religion is kicking in. AND don't even tell me that atheism isn't a religion because I'll just have to pwn you on that too obnoxious retard.

[MaximusArurealius]

@daNDayati "The grown-ups have already moved on and are using evolution in practical ways.." What practical ways dummass? Does evolution help you change a tire on your car, cook a meal, take a crap? Tell oh Mr Science Genius just what are the practical ways. Even the medical field says evolution is of no use to medicine. You don't look up evolution to do surgery you stupid bastard. You come here insulting people so don't go crying to mommy when you get your dick slapped.

[MaximusArurealius]

@daNDayati "round per se no.. it is an oblate spheroid" HAR HAR HAR AND YOU call ME an idiot? HAR HAR HAR You fucking moron, have you ever seen pictures of the Earth? It's fucking ROUND you dummass. AND for YOU to go into a hissy over a minor point (red herring) having NOTHING to do with the discussion just proves 1. what an asshole you are 2. that you are a liar.

[daNDayati]

@owensphil and before I forget... have you got any other target theories on your religious hit parade? quantum mechanics? (not that is a slippery one..) I sure there is something godless and un-biblicable about that sneaky theory ..

[daNDayati]

@owensphil hey, how are you doing? still trying to peddle the controversy? The grown-ups have already moved on and are using evolution in practical ways.. its about time you became a grown-up too...

[daNDayati]

@MaximusArurealius round per se no.. it is an oblate spheroid, January 2005 Researchers at The University of Texas at Austin using NASA satellite data found that significant changes in the Earth's shape in the past 28 years may be linked to climate events such as the El Nino weather pattern. You are an idiot. Get treatment (or just enroll in college).. some of your idiocy is probably by reinforcement through association (stay away from bible school).. and good luck!

[MaximusArurealius]

Eugenie, historically the consensus view is ALWAYS WRONG. Consensus is an ad populum argument. Science is about ONE investigator proving the consensus wrong. It's always been that way. AND WHEN a scientist finds some new discovery the consensus is always there to destroy him if they can. They are a lying, jealous bunch.

[MaximusArurealius]

Eugenie Scott, You're a liar. If the shoe were on the other foot you'd be yelling "academic freedom."

But here you are saying fairness is irrelevant in science. Of course, you don't want anyone questioning your dishonest speech on evolution of the eyeball. You're a typical lying Marxist. You are hereby,

EXPOSED AS A FRAUD