The "Skeptic"

Brian Sussman, award-winning meteorologist, and author of bestselling book "Climategate," discusses the University of California professor who went from being a global warming skeptic to a global warming believer.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• global
• warming
• skeptic
• becomes
• believer

[mphello]

You are an absolute piece of shit who clearly freeloads off society and has never done a hard day of work in your life. And, no - you lie about being a "meterologist".

You fail conveniently to point out that none of the shit on that worthless WUWT

website is peer-reviewed, and fail to point out the thousands of peer-reviewed papers (which one can find on the IPCC website) which prove AGW.

You're an unpatriotic anti-American coward as all anti-vegetarians, conservatives, AGW-deniers are.

[mphello]

@mphello or refer to NASA, IPCC, JPL and those who HAVE done those massively complex calculations as the appropriate authority.

Ever seen a Pixar animated movie? Infinitely closer approximation of real fluid and mass object flow than all the bullshit comments made ABOUT those movies.

Environmentalists and the IPCC were doing fine, getting the world off fossil fuels and switched to sustainables

when the Kochbots, anti-environmentalists and anti-vegetarians interfered.

[mphello]

@mphello reasoning to all the endless stream of bullshit words by anthropogenic global warming (AGW) deniers and even to those who know AGW is real. *I* cannot prove AGW, but NASA and JPL can, and ONLY computer models - not bullshit prose words - are the BEST (not perfect, but the best) way at making predictions about the effects of causes (human GHGs).

So, until one does all those hardcore calculations, including ALL the variables that NASA and the IPCC and JPL have, one should either STFU

[mphello]

By contrast, climate scientists and the computer programmers at NASA and JPL are freakin' GOD in making predictions in THEIR field (climate science) compared to all the bullshit business leaders, economists, psychics, legal experts are in making predictions in THEIR fields.

That's because, those math and computer models are the ONLY way to LOGICALLY CONSISTENTLY COMPUTE THE RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDE of the effects of all causes. Those models are an INFINITELY

superior form of

[mphello]

Economists and so-called "psychics" and homeocrapic "doctors" and military generals can prognosticate all they want about the future: which countries will go to war, what the economy will be. And it's ALL bullshit, because no rigorous double-blind study is EVER done of their so-called predictions about events that are poorly defined and based on human nature. What about all the predictions they got wrong? How do you even DEFINE in a logically consistent matter WHO caused what to happen?

[drkstrong]

Muller has gone from being the darling of the AGW skeptics (just look at all the videos of him talking down AGW here on YT) to a "whack job" in 1 day after he took $600,000 from the Koch brothers (oilmen and tea party funders) to do a study to prove AWG is wrong and he came to the opposite conclusion when he looked at the data.

There has been warming since 1998 - wrong again. See

watch?v=Ai6ju28nAyk

if you can find a flaw in that analysis let me know. Nobody has yet.

[MrBillTroop73]

Great job Suss!

If all goes well, I'll see you guys tomorrow!