Congressional Democrats Vote For Dependence on Foreign Oil
Uploader Comments (lindaclements)
Top Comments
-
I forgot, Clinton vetoed ANWR in 19994, the house and senate 'passed" it! it would be producing oil now. Remember, these same anti oil libs said Prudhoe bay would only produce about 1 yrs supply! Guess what? It,s still going strong! The same environmentalists are saying the same thing about ANWR! It is so frustrating to most of us longtime Alaskans, who have heard the same old stuff from these tree huggers1 Most are from big citys, that have no pristine land left! How ironic! AK has plenty!!!
All Comments (25)
-
I live on solar and wind..
It's expensive..it's not anywhere near the power you get from the grid and most people can't afford it.
The appliance to run off of 'renewable energy' is expensive.
Do I like it?
Yes.
But to 'dream' about this country running on solar, wind, hydro etc alone is ludicrous unless you want everyone to go to a third world standard of living.
Renewablt energy is a suppliment to power, not a silver bullet.
-
you're right - ALL
INCLUDING drilling for oil !!!!
-
We can make oil we have been making oil for years we dont need to drill for it when we can make it
we need to use all the altenatives
-
btw: oil is NOT the future, renewable energy is, because as dumb as all of you are you obviously know that oil is not renewable.
-
hundreds of thousands of gallons have been spilled in prudhoe bay. There is no excuse for that and no matter how high gas prices get, nothing will ever make up for that. Our Earth is priceless.
btw: places are protected FOR A REASON. just because you are resident of Alaska and are willing to destroy your state's naturual beaut - doesn't make you right.
-
You are to ignorant to realize, as our the "tax happy" that no they don't stop hiring tax paying workers, what they do is hire lobbyists to create loopholes and if they can't get one, they just pass the expense on top of the cost of a product or service.
I mean really, ask yourself the Reagan question - are you better off than you were 4 or 8 years ago??? No 98% are not.
-
Eco-Nazis have taken the air in LosAngeles and the SanFernando Valley,which used to have smog alerts daily in the summer to zero this year. If thats taking us back to the dark ages so be it... but in reality its bringing us into a sustainable future. If they wanted to go stoneAge why would they need to redistribute the wealth. Besides if they go to far back, the Republicans have most of the guns so they'd loose that game (me being the exception to the rule, I'm a gun nut Democrat!!).
the ULTIMATE in ANTI-Obama Apparel:
NeoConShirts(.)com
Outfitting The New Conservatives !!!
lindaclements 3 years ago
the ULTIMATE in ANTI-Obama Apparel:
NeoConShirts(.)com
Outfitting The New Conservatives !!!
lindaclements 3 years ago
the ULTIMATE in ANTI-Obama Apparel:
NeoConShirts(.)com
Outfitting The New Conservatives !!!
lindaclements 3 years ago
I live here in Alaska. We up here are just amazed how ignorant people are who are against drilling in ANWr. Remember, the same things were said about Prudhoe bay,over 30 yrs ago. Guess what? It,s still pumping oil! The largest field in North America! The caribou pop has increased,etc... AnWR is right next door! It is "19 million" acres!!! Only approx '10,000" acres would be developed! Most against it, have never been there,and have no clue how it is up here in Alaska in general!
onlyoneak 3 years ago 4
I agree 100%
I just have one issue....
The eco-nazis are not ignorant
They know exactly what they're doing
They're systematically taking us back to the dark ages. And they will stop at nothing until they accomplish that goal.
Oh yeah, and of course the redistribution of wealth. They are too ignorant to understand that when you tax the wealthy, they hold their money and stop hiring tax payers, thus crushing the economy. So I guess you're right.
THEY ARE IGNORANT !!! :-D
lindaclements 3 years ago