Tao Te Ching & I-Ching (1)

I-Ching is much older than Laotze. Laotze's philosophy is derived from the ancient I-Ching. If you understand the I-Ching, you will find the root of Laotze's philosophy. It aids in the comprehension of Laotze.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Laotze
• Tao
• Te
• Ching
• I-Ching
• Buddhism
• Laozi
• Zhuangzi
• Chan
• Zen
• Tai-Chi
• Qi
• Gong
• Yoga
• Feng
• Shui
• numerology
• Pre-natal
• King
• Wen
• arrangement
• eight
• trigram
• Yin
• Yang
• Dao
• De
• Jing

[IChingKing]

I have not seen any English version of Tao De Ching accurately reflecting the Chinese original version. Even in Chinese versions, there are many annotations misleading. Try to read more different versions of Tao De Ching, you'll get more confused. Thanks for the comment.

[owlbeard]

@ncigntujyang

All the Chinese history and academic studies I have read about the DaodeJing and Laozi put Laozi as either Chinese person or actually no one particular person, but a series of writers. This latter statement is generally accepted among most, if not all, scholars. To say that he was a Meo person from the state of Lue is a reach at the very least.

[rumblefish1988]

finally someone on youtube who actually understands the universal order!

[ShaktipatSeer2]

Incredibly enlightening.. thanks so much!!

[compr3ss3dr3ality]

Thank you for posting this

[geekeing]

@Thunderook .I don't know if you have been following my dialogue with ncigntujyang but he refuses to present his sources for his outrageous claims. Now, he even claims Sun Tzu was not Chinese and Kung-fu is not Chinese...lol. Myself, until I learn otherwise or he is more forthcoming with his academic sources I consider ncigntujyang a troll. HIs behavior certainly fits the profile. By the way, don't you think it odd he did not respond to you for 9 months until someone else spoke contrary to him?

[geekeing]

@owlbeard ....thank you for your supportive comment. I see ncigntujyang has not seen fit to respond to your comment. He might not....at least for a long time...lol. After making his first outrageous comment he did not respond to thunderook for 9 months until I countered his comment. And if you read any of his follow-up comments he chooses not to support his viewpoints, we have to accept his word because he says so....lol. Without proper support I see him now as a Troll.

[geekeing]

@ncigntujyang .....lol

[ncigntujyang]

@geekeing You asshole....I don't need to give you any resources. you need to go read it base on what I telling you and the world. Did you also know that the art of war was not really from Chinese person writer? Please go check it out where these people live in that time so you will know that ...that time Chinese people were not live in those areas. I repeating myself b/c I want you to know that what I says is true base on many sholars.

[geekeing]

@ncigntujyang ...you are repeating yourself. You have stated all this before. Before further discussion I would like to review your sources to see if your claims are valid or you are simply a Troll.

[ncigntujyang]

@geekeing

If you read chinese history about Tao and Confucious and compare their political views...you will know that Tao is more democratice ideology and Confucious' view is more detatorship or King rule. Those two political view are similar or the same as Thomas Hope and John Lock. Regarding Tao's ancestor...Tao was not chinese if you track down to where he was born and raise. Even Chinese scholar some times refer Tao as "babarious"...