Roger Federer vs Tim Henman - Basel Final 2001
Top Comments
All Comments (142)
-
Henman was a great player, he had a winning record against Federer for a long time. Once Federer started to dominate Henman didn't get a look-in against him, but that's hardly an indictment of Henman's skill. Leyton Hewitt looked like he would become the dominant force at the turn of the century, and even he couldn't stop Federer for years once Federer started winning majors regularly (Hewitt has beaten Federer once in their last ten or so meetings). Henman's no all-time great, but he WAS great.
-
if only he knew how big he will become...
-
wow henman ahd rogers number in 2001, henman had a good year in 2001 he shud have really won wimbledon that year only if it wasnt for goran ivansevic's miraculous run
-
Mirka's gained some weight since then... :)
-
Loving Henman at the end taking the piss over how easily he beat the greatest tennis player of all time. Of course he wasn't to know at the time!
-
why is everyone so shocked to see him cry? He did that lots of times, when he won and also when he lost. Sorry i can't exactly remember what tournaments it were but I'm sure i've seen it lots of times.
-
WARNING: ONLY POSITIVE FEEDBACK FOR FEDERER ON THIS THREAD ALLOWED.
-
Aww man, the quality of the tennis here was high and this was a good video on nearly all accounts, but mannnn, my guy LOST in the video so I guess I'll have to thumb down the video because I can't deal with reality much.
-
Ive never seen Federer frustrated like that o.O
-
When he was 10 he would sit under the umpire's chair for 2 hours crying. So this is a huge improvement.
Roger's tears=a passion to win. He was crushed he lost to Henman, NO DOUBT he knew he should have won. GO ROGER!THIS YEAR IN PARIS!
72seeker72 3 years ago 105
anyone at that level is a good player.That's a simple fact.
tommie66tx 3 years ago 66