Giant Footprint with Michael Tellinger & Klaus Dona - Jan 2012.avi
Top Comments
All Comments (120)
-
Your right Michael it would make a good tourist attraction .
-
@fishboy1111111 where does the bible state the age of the earth?
-
@tomperanteau not everything that lives in the ocean had gills, theres plenty of mammals living in the ocean without gills and plenty of other creatures like cepholapods, sea horses, mollusks, lobsters and plenty of others that live underwater without gills, gills are just one way of drawing oxygen out of water, our ancestors werent fish at somepoint however if you go back farther fish and mammals will have evolved from the same ancestor at some point.
-
what the atheist are going to say now????????
-
out of the the billions of years of evolution on this planet.....how is it not possible for giants to have been here? Visited...checked things out....realized at that time the plant may not have been habitable...and then left.....it is reasonable to think such a think could have happened....
-
After careful examination, I have determined that this giant had only one leg and was navigating a partly cooled lava field. Imagine something the size of a sperm whale hoping on one foot. The foot broke the crust resulting in one giant hot foot impression. He then rolled down the hill, screaming in agony into a now prehistoric lake and drowned. Soon after the nearby volcano expelled millions of tonnes of ash and mud burying the footprint. Eventually, the earth thrusted the print out again.
-
@Xp3ktus It is wise not believe everything we see on youtube. Healthy skepticism is good, but its also good to keep an open mind. Even if they had sandblasting techniques why would anyone perpetrate a hoax in a place where there was virtually no chance of anyone ever seeing it. Most perps want some ego gratification for their efforts and that would be unlikely here. Records of ancient cultures also assert there were giants in the past. This warrants further investigation at least.
@YannisMk Do you really think one of the first things that would have been accomplished with the brand new primitive blasting that existed in 1870 would have been to drag it to a remote area in South Africa up a hill to form a footprint in solid rock? If it was even possible the time and expense involved would have been extreme. And the result? Form a footprint that would not be widely known about for over 100 years? What you are suggesting is illogical. This is real and hidden by "science".
Meathead36 1 week ago 4
@milivela5 wtf does that even mean, a giant footprint doesnt prove god exists, if anything it disproves the bible and backs up athiests because of the age of the footprint
fishboy1111111 3 days ago 2