Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Irriducible Complexity debunked ?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
158 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 19, 2009

A response to atheist libertys video "intelligent design is not science"

I have heard it said many times that IRRIDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY has been debunked
Has it really ?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (pestmanpat)

  • So this intelligent designer designed the flagellum on bacteria whic enables them to infect their host better? I asked a similar question about native americans and their lack of resistance to smallpox that allowed them to get wiped out to an IDer. Why would a designer be so cruel??

  • @Ramshobraja thats a good question but i says nothin for or against the logical conclusion that the flagellum appears to be designed.

  • Best article I can find on the pili (Type III Secretory) is from "w w w (dot) sciencemag (dot) org/cgi/content/abstract/280/5­363/602" Remember to change the (dot) to a "." and remove all spaces to make the link work.

  • i cant get that link to work can you cut and paste a relevant section.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Intelligent Design is Not Science
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Not only has IC not been debunked, it hasn't even been addressed. That is, virtually everything argument against IC is an attack against the strawman that ID doesn't allow for parts of IC systems to have different functions. This is the Ken Miller objection and it simply leaves IC untouched. So what if part of a flagellum is (like) a toxin syringe - this is like throwing an engine at a bicycle and getting a motorbike. Behe dealt with this possibly when he first introduced IC in DarwinBB (p.65/6)

  • Wikipedia search for "flagellum" and check the links in the "External Links" section. There are several covering bacterial pili (the "syringe" mentioned) and explaining the use by the cells to feed either toxins, digestive enymes or DNA into another cell. The pili are used for all 3 activities and are also how drug resistance is traded between species. New information shared on the bacterial internet.

  • Sure you say

    May i have a link to this information

    I like to see this toxin syringe in action

  • Sure. That was also seen. The same parts were seen forming such a "syringe" and even a DNA exchange bridge. All the parts have other uses in the same species, other species and even foul up several cell mechanisms with one unfavorable genetic mutation. The reason scientists don't trumpet this information around to make Creationists look foolish is... they don't think it's worth the effort or would serve any useful purpose. Instead, other YouTube users are doing that *for* them.

  • if you can show how parts of the flagelum have been removed to form a toxin syringe let me know.

  • (2 of 2) In fact, in one experiment where a critical gene (it coded for a critical component of the flagellum) was disabled, the only effect observed was that the flagellum switched from a purely spiral motion to a back-and forth waving motion. Less efficient. This, it turned out, was because of one of the older systems that coded for a proton pump, still in use by the cell, replaced the knocked out version. The difference? The old pump worked in bursts and the newer replacement continuosuly.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more