The Morality of Capitalism 3 - Ayn Rand Institute
Loading...
2,929
Loading...
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to The Morality of Capitalism 2 - Ayn Rand Institute
Loading...
@lumpagogo
"The theory is that no amount of property at risk justifies the taking of a life.
Usually your's or another person's life must be at imminent risk before you can shoot (per epic37 at yota tech forum 3/5/05)." In PA, the law favors the intruder unless there is a home invasion with guns drawn.
lumpagogo 1 year ago
@lumpagogo you cant shoot someone who has broken into your home anymore? (In the US)
TheGodofAtheists 1 year ago
@tknode1
My want to smoke/snort something--jail
My want to look at something on the net--jail
My want to play a poker machine at Joe's Bar--jail for Joe + me.
My want to bet a ball game--jail for bookie + me
My want to have a poker game (dollar-two) at home--jail
My want to shoot an intruder--biggie jail for me
My don't want open borders, nor the American Dream for unwanted guests--my seen as a bigot
lumpagogo 1 year ago
This should be a "required" session for Highschool Seniors! Plan simple "economic" words for those entering the workplace/encomony, society as adults...
tknode1 2 years ago
I doubt we can. We can work to change the culture, through the education of future generations, especially of future intellectuals. For that, we need to recruit people in academia, teachers, and maybe even so called "opinion multipliers".
deinse81 3 years ago
Yes, I agree that the central focus of individual rights sets this nation apart from all others, however, we have a generation of people educated by the Liberal left and they almost unanimously (except for the few thinkers) accept the dogma. The majority of the people I work and associate with are Socialists, through and through. But I'm in New England, which is an Obama state, so perhaps other parts are not so Socialist.
How can we change this situation to enlighten people?
basspig 3 years ago
True, but those people are a small minority. Another small minority are the true believers on the right.
However, the majority of americans are still grounded in reality, and they are open to rational ideas that would confirm what they already know deep down: this country is the best because of its emphasis on the individual, and on freedom.
deinse81 3 years ago
No matter how well a position is presented, there seems to be no way to access a closed mind--which is the bulk of the Liberals and religious concervatives that I know. I just finished with a mult-week debate with five friends via e-mail. It was an exercise in utter frustration. The people are unwilling to really listen, or unable to use Reason at all. Smart in many areas of their careers, but hard-core Socialists. :-(
basspig 3 years ago
Brook is actually the best objectivist speaker I've seen, in the sense that he can explain things in a way reluctant, uninformed listeners can in fact understand. It doesn't require any knowledge of philosophy or a long attention-span on their part to at least understand that there is a viable alternative to altruism: then they can make their own choices, that's their problem.
deinse81 3 years ago
That's funny, I didn't realize eating that much ice cream was in one's rational self interest. I should run out and start eating then. I'm actually allowed to eat as much as I want.
Your argument is silly for several reasons:
1. You are using an example with children.
2. Why would you use eating too much icecream as an argument against self interest? In fact people following their rational self interest would never eat too much icecream, obviously.( those following cravings instead will)
deinse81 3 years ago